How Congress voted on legislation that matters — and who funded the politicians who decided.
+21st Century ROAD to Housing Act H.R. 6644
Passed
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to expand affordable housing by reforming zoning and permitting laws, increasing housing development incentives, and addressing structural barriers to homeownership for low- and moderate-income families.
Who it helps: Current homeowners who benefit from restricted housing supply keeping property values high; real estate investors in supply-constrained markets; local governments and neighborhoods that resist zoning changes. Impact: Would have created 500K affordable housing units by expanding FHA limits and HOME program funding for 3M low-income renters
Who it hurts: Low- and moderate-income renters in communities with housing shortages; first-generation homebuyers; renters spending over 30% of income on housing in high-cost metro areas; 3 million households on FHA program waitlists.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$18.0M
National Association of Realtors$15.9M
American Bankers Association$1.7M
National Multifamily Housing Council Inc$1.6M
Credit Union National Association, INC. dba America's Credit Unions$1.1M
National Association of Home Builders$910K
Mortgage Bankers Association$750K
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers$710K
National Apartment Association$700K
Rocket Lp Fka Rkt Holdings$520K
Nucor Corporation$510K
Commercial Real Estate Finance Council$470K
Municipal Castings Association Formerly Municipal Castings Fair Trade Council$250K
Airbnb, INC.$250K
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated$150K
The Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition$110K
National Affordable Housing Management Association (Nahma)$100K
Alliance for American Manufacturing$90K
Enterprise Community Partners, INC. .$78K
American Seniors Housing Association$75K
Mr. Cooper$60K
International Code Council (Icc)$60K
Grounded Solutions Network$60K
Up for Growth Action Inc$50K
Darroweverett Llp Fka Saxon, Gilmore & Carraway, Pa Obo Meridian River Dev Corp$50K
Andersen Corporation$50K
Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition$50K
Pennymac Financial Services$40K
National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association$40K
National Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies$30K
National Association of Affordable Housing Lenders (Naahl)$30K
Bipartisan Policy Center Action$30K
Conference of Provincials of North America$20K
Job Creators Network$6K
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+American Rescue Plan Act H.R. 1319
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A $1.9 trillion 2021 law providing COVID-19 relief through direct stimulus payments, extended unemployment benefits, an expanded Child Tax Credit, state and local aid, and vaccine distribution funding.
Who it helps: Businesses that gain leverage from worker economic precarity; fiscal conservatives opposing federal deficit expansion; financial sector benefiting from lower-than-otherwise consumer inflation. Impact: $1,400 direct payments to 160M Americans; expanded Child Tax Credit cut child poverty by 46% in 2021
Who it hurts: 160 million Americans receiving $1,400 stimulus payments, parents of 65 million children whose Child Tax Credit doubled, 11 million unemployed workers on extended benefits, uninsured individuals, small businesses, and state and local governments.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Senate vote — March 6, 2021
✓ Yes: 50✗ No: 49
House vote — March 10, 2021
✓ Yes: 220✗ No: 211
House vote was to concur in the Senate amendment, sending the bill to the President. Signed into law March 11, 2021.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021 H.R. 133
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A $2.3 trillion omnibus bill funding the federal government for fiscal year 2021 and providing $900 billion in COVID-19 relief, including $600 direct payments, extended unemployment benefits, and business aid.
Who it helps: Businesses that preferred smaller direct payments; employers who benefit from workers' economic urgency; fiscal conservatives who opposed the level of deficit spending. Impact: $600 direct payments and $300/week extended unemployment for 16M workers through March 2021
Who it hurts: Federal workers and program beneficiaries across all agencies; 16 million workers receiving $300/week extended unemployment; households receiving $600 stimulus payments; small businesses and nonprofits receiving PPP funding.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+PPP and Health Care Enhancement Act H.R. 266
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A 2020 law adding $484 billion in funding to the Paycheck Protection Program for small businesses, along with $75 billion for hospitals and $25 billion for COVID-19 testing infrastructure.
Who it helps: Larger businesses and banks that processed higher-fee PPP loans before smaller businesses were cut off from the original funding; financial institutions that administered PPP loans. Impact: Provided $310B additional PPP funding that saved an estimated 2.5M small business jobs during COVID shutdowns
Who it hurts: Small businesses that exhausted first-round PPP funding, representing approximately 2.5 million saved jobs; hospitals and health systems receiving $75 billion in relief; testing programs serving tens of millions of Americans.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Families First Coronavirus Response Act H.R. 6201
Passed
Bill impact
What it does: A March 2020 law requiring paid emergency sick and family leave for workers affected by COVID-19, mandating free testing, expanding Medicaid funding, and providing nutrition assistance during the pandemic.
Who it helps: Large employers with 500+ employees exempt from the paid leave mandate; staffing agencies and gig economy companies that avoided paid leave obligations; businesses that preferred no federal paid leave floor. Impact: Mandated two weeks paid sick leave for 87M private-sector workers; provided free COVID testing to 40M uninsured
Who it hurts: 87 million private-sector workers gaining two weeks of paid sick leave; 40 million uninsured Americans gaining free COVID testing; working parents with sick children; low-income families on expanded nutrition assistance.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Access to Baby Formula Act 2022 H.R. 7791
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 emergency measure providing supplemental FDA funding and import flexibility to address a nationwide infant formula shortage caused by a major manufacturer recall and supply chain disruptions.
Who it helps: Domestic infant formula manufacturers (Abbott, Mead Johnson, Gerber) who gained market share from reduced import competition; specialty formula providers during the scarcity period. Impact: During 2022 shortage, 43 states had out-of-stock rates above 40%; 3.5M formula-fed infants faced supply disruption
Who it hurts: 3.5 million formula-fed infants during the 2022 shortage, particularly low-income families relying on WIC; 43 states reporting out-of-stock rates above 40%; parents unable to access alternatives at any price.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Protecting Medicare from Sequester Cuts S. 610
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to temporarily suspend or offset the automatic sequestration cuts that would otherwise reduce Medicare provider reimbursement rates under the Budget Control Act spending caps.
Who it helps: Deficit hawks and fiscal conservatives who support automatic spending caps as a budget mechanism; budget negotiators who use Medicare cuts as leverage in broader fiscal negotiations. Impact: Prevented automatic 2% Medicare sequester cuts protecting 60M beneficiaries from reduced reimbursements that would have shrunk provider networks
Who it hurts: 60 million Medicare beneficiaries who could face reduced access to providers if reimbursement rates fell by 2%; physicians, hospitals, and rural providers most vulnerable to reduced reimbursements.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Keep Kids Fed Act 2022 S. 2089
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 law providing operational flexibility to summer and school meal programs to address supply chain disruptions and extend pandemic-era waivers allowing schools to serve meals at no cost to all children.
Who it helps: States and districts that preferred returning to means-tested meal programs after pandemic waivers; fiscal conservatives opposing universal school meal costs. Impact: Extended pandemic school meal waivers providing free meals to 10M additional children through June 2023
Who it hurts: 10 million additional children who received free school meals under extended pandemic waivers; low-income families in districts unable to afford universal free meals without federal reimbursement.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act S. 3823
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to permanently increase the debt ceiling under which small businesses can file for streamlined Subchapter V bankruptcy, making restructuring more accessible for small and mid-sized enterprises.
Who it helps: Secured creditors and banks who prefer Chapter 7 liquidation over reorganization; institutional lenders who benefit from higher-threshold cases remaining in more complex standard bankruptcy proceedings. Impact: Raised Subchapter V debt ceiling from $2.75M to $7.5M, making bankruptcy restructuring accessible to 180K additional small businesses
Who it hurts: 180,000 additional small businesses with debts between $2.75M and $7.5M that gained access to streamlined Subchapter V bankruptcy; small business owners who can reorganize without liquidating their business.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Farm and Food Security Act 2026 H.R. 7567
Bill impact
What it does: A reauthorization of the Farm Bill governing federal agricultural and nutrition policy, covering SNAP food assistance, crop insurance, conservation programs, rural development funding, and commodity price supports.
Who it helps: Agribusiness corporations seeking fewer commodity program regulations; fiscal conservatives seeking SNAP reductions; large commodity traders who operate with less price support competition. Impact: Reauthorizes SNAP for 42M Americans; program kept 3.2M people out of poverty annually in recent years
Who it hurts: 42 million SNAP recipients; 2 million farmers and ranchers relying on crop insurance and commodity price supports; rural communities dependent on USDA development programs; food banks receiving commodity purchases.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
American Security Fund$280K
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Protecting Retirement Savings Act H.R. 2988
Bill impact
What it does: A bill strengthening fiduciary duty protections for 401(k) and pension plan participants and restricting the use of non-financial ESG factors in managing ERISA-covered retirement plan investments.
Who it helps: Traditional asset managers and non-ESG funds competing for retirement plan assets; fossil fuel producers and defense companies whose stocks are excluded from ESG screens; financial advisors who sell conventional non-ESG products.
Who it hurts: 55 million 401(k) participants barred from ESG investment options; plan participants who would have benefited from ESG funds that have outperformed traditional benchmarks. Impact: Bans 55M 401k participants from ESG funds that have outperformed traditional benchmarks by 2.4% annually since 2015
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Aarp$5.3M
American Council of Life Insurers$4.1M
American Association for Justice$1.8M
Principal Financial Group$1.4M
Investment Company Institute$1.3M
Afl-cio$1.0M
Pacific Life Insurance Company$700K
Insured Retirement Institute$590K
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$314K
Ameriprise Financial, INC.$230K
Americans for Financial Reform$150K
Ceres, INC.$100K
National Taxpayers Union$90K
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Tipped Employee Protection Act H.R. 2312
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to codify Department of Labor tip credit regulations, clarify when employers may take a tip credit, and ensure that tips belong to employees and cannot be pooled with non-tipped managers.
Who it helps: Restaurant owners, hotel operators, and service industry employers who can pay newly covered workers as little as $2.13/hour; the National Restaurant Association, which lobbied for the tipped minimum wage structure.
Who it hurts: 5.5 million workers in industries newly made eligible for tip credit, who could be paid as little as $2.13/hour federal tipped minimum; workers in industries where tips are irregular or low. Impact: Expands tipped employee definition to cover 5.5M more workers who could be paid as little as $2.13/hour federal tipped minimum
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
National Restaurant Association$2.5M
National Retail Federation$1.6M
Afl-cio$760K
Center for Law and Social Policy (Clasp)amount undisclosed
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Affordable HOMES Act H.R. 5184
Bill impact
What it does: A bill that rescinds Department of Energy energy efficiency standards for HUD-code manufactured homes, rolling back requirements that would have reduced utility costs for manufactured home owners.
Who it helps: Manufactured home manufacturers (Cavco Industries, Skyline Champion) avoiding energy efficiency compliance costs; manufactured home community operators; HUD-code housing trade associations.
Who it hurts: 8 million manufactured homeowners — disproportionately low-income, rural, and elderly — who lose $250–$400/year in utility savings from rescinded energy efficiency standards. Impact: Rescinds energy efficiency standards for 8M manufactured homes; low-income owners lose $250-400/year in utility savings
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
American Chemistry Council$6.8M
Basf Corporation$200K
Sierra Club$80K
Center for Responsible Lending a Supporting Corp of Ctr for Community Self-help$80K
American Council for an Energy-efficient Economy$80K
Somfy North America$63K
National Taxpayers Union$30K
Lg Electronics Usa, INC.$30K
Manufactured Housing Institute$22K
How Congress voted
House vote — January 9, 2026
✓ Yes: 263✗ No: 147
House passed; the Senate has not yet voted.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Do No Harm in Medicaid Act H.R. 498
Bill impact
What it does: A 2025 bill imposing Medicaid work requirements, restricting Medicaid funding for gender-affirming care, and limiting the scope of ACA Medicaid expansion eligibility for working-age adults.
Who it helps: States seeking to reduce Medicaid rolls and budget expenditures; managed care organizations receiving fewer Medicaid enrollments; employers who benefit from reduced worker bargaining power when employees fear losing Medicaid coverage.
Who it hurts: Working-age Medicaid recipients in expansion states — CBO projects 10 million of 13 million affected would lose coverage; individuals with chronic conditions, disabilities, or caregiving responsibilities who cannot document work hours. Impact: CBO projects work requirements would cause 10M of 13M affected Medicaid recipients to lose coverage
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
American Academy of Family Physicians$2.8M
United States Telecom Assn$640K
Human Rights Campaign$614K
American Civil Liberties Union$580K
Competitive Carriers Association$480K
American Psychiatric Association$392K
American Academy of Pediatrics$100K
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc$94K
National Women's Law Center Action Fund$85K
United States Telecom Association$50K
Mental Health Association of New York City, INC. (dba Vibrant Emotional Health)$40K
National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners$24K
Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc$8K
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Social Security Child Protection Act H.R. 5348
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to prohibit the Social Security Administration from sharing its records with immigration enforcement agencies, protecting children who receive Social Security benefits from enforcement actions against their parents.
Who it helps: Immigration enforcement agencies seeking access to SSA records; those who support using Social Security data in enforcement actions against undocumented parents. Impact: 4.4M children receive Social Security benefits averaging $972/month; protects eligibility from proposed benefit cuts
Who it hurts: 4.4 million children receiving Social Security benefits averaging $972/month whose parents are undocumented and at risk of deportation; mixed-status families relying on children's Social Security payments for household income.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Aarp$3.8M
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+No Hidden FEES Act H.R. 6543
Bill impact
What it does: A bill requiring hotels, vacation rental platforms, and other hospitality businesses to display the total price of a booking including all fees and charges upfront at the time of search.
Who it helps: Hotel chains (Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG) that advertise artificially low rates while collecting resort fees; short-term rental platforms (Airbnb, Vrbo) that add cleaning fees and service charges at checkout. Impact: FTC estimates junk fees cost American households $65B annually; bill would have required all-in pricing across major industries
Who it hurts: Hotel guests and vacation rental customers deceived by advertised prices that exclude resort fees, cleaning fees, and service charges averaging $40/night; consumers comparing prices across booking platforms.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+CASH Act H.R. 9051
Bill impact
What it does: A 2020 bill passed by the House to increase the COVID-19 stimulus payment from $600 to $2,000 per adult; blocked in the Senate and never enacted into law.
Who it helps: Banks and financial institutions retaining customer deposits rather than seeing them converted to consumer spending; employers who benefit from workers' economic urgency to return to jobs. Impact: Passed House 275-134 on December 28, 2020. Senate never held a floor vote. Would have raised COVID direct payments from $600 to $2,000 — $4B more per week into working families' hands
Who it hurts: Approximately 160 million Americans who received $600 stimulus checks and would have received $2,000 had this passed; households earning under $75,000 hit hardest by pandemic income loss.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Emergency Housing Protections Act H.R. 7301
Bill impact
What it does: A 2020 bill to establish a national eviction moratorium and mortgage forbearance program for renters and homeowners facing income loss during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Who it helps: Landlords who preferred to proceed with evictions; mortgage servicers and lenders seeking to foreclose on distressed properties; real estate investors positioned to purchase properties at distressed prices. Impact: Extended eviction moratorium protecting 12M renters at risk; provided $100B in emergency rental assistance
Who it hurts: 12 million renters at risk of eviction during the COVID-19 pandemic; homeowners facing foreclosure or missed mortgage payments; low-income households spending over half their income on housing.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+ACA Patient Protection Enhancement Act H.R. 1425
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to strengthen Affordable Care Act protections by capping out-of-pocket premiums, expanding marketplace subsidies, and closing the Medicaid coverage gap in states that did not expand the program.
Who it helps: Health insurance companies that benefit from higher premiums in markets without enhanced subsidy competition; states that deliberately chose not to expand Medicaid; employers who prefer workers remain dependent on employer-sponsored coverage. Impact: Would have expanded ACA subsidies for 21M uninsured and closed Medicaid gap for 4M in non-expansion states
Who it hurts: 21 million uninsured Americans who would gain coverage through expanded subsidies and Medicaid gap closure; 4 million in non-expansion states; marketplace enrollees paying above 8.5% of income in premiums.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention H.R. 7688
Bill impact
What it does: A bill authorizing the President to declare a federal energy emergency and making it unlawful to charge unconscionably excessive prices for gasoline or home heating fuel during such emergencies.
Who it helps: Integrated oil majors (ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP) that collectively made $134 billion in profits in 2022; energy trading firms; petroleum refiners with significant margin pricing power during supply constraints. Impact: During 2022 spike, oil majors made $134B in profits while average family spent $5,000/year on fuel
Who it hurts: American households spending an average $5,000 on fuel in 2022; low-income commuters for whom fuel costs represent the highest share of income; small businesses with high transportation input costs.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Lower Food and Fuel Costs Act H.R. 7606
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 House-passed bill addressing inflation through regulatory rollbacks, domestic energy and agricultural production incentives, and permitting reforms intended to lower food and fuel prices.
Who it helps: Energy companies benefiting from regulatory rollbacks in the bill; agricultural producers gaining from expanded ethanol requirements; commodity traders in the markets the bill targeted. Impact: Package targeting record 8.8% share of income spent on food and fuel by working families during 2022 inflation
Who it hurts: Working families spending a record 8.8% of income on food and fuel at 2022 inflation peak; low-income households most exposed to fuel price spikes; rural communities dependent on personal vehicle transportation.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Infant Formula Appropriations Act 2022 H.R. 7790
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 emergency supplemental appropriations bill providing $28 million to the FDA and other federal agencies to accelerate response to the nationwide infant formula shortage.
Who it helps: Domestic formula manufacturers gaining market share from reduced import competition during the shortage period; suppliers and distributors managing scarce supply. Impact: Provided $28M emergency FDA funding to fast-track foreign formula safety clearances during shortage affecting 3.5M infants
Who it hurts: 3.5 million formula-fed infants affected by the shortage; WIC program participants who account for 60% of all formula consumption and had the fewest alternatives; families in lower-income brackets.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Securing a Strong Retirement Act H.R. 2954
Bill impact
What it does: A bill expanding access to workplace retirement savings by requiring automatic enrollment in new plans, extending eligibility to long-term part-time workers, and raising catch-up contribution limits for older workers.
Who it helps: Financial advisors and insurance companies that work with IRA rollovers from workers who lack workplace plans; annuity sellers serving workers without employer-sponsored plans. Impact: 57M Americans have no workplace retirement plan; added auto-enrollment for 15M workers and $5,000/year catch-up contributions for ages 60-63
Who it hurts: 57 million Americans with no workplace retirement plan who benefit from expanded access; 15 million long-term part-time workers newly eligible for 401(k) enrollment; workers ages 60–63 gaining higher catch-up contribution limits.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Comprehensive Debt Collection Act H.R. 2547
Bill impact
What it does: A bill updating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to restrict debt collector contact methods and frequency, ban collection of time-barred debts, and expand consumer protections against abusive collection practices.
Who it helps: Debt collection agencies and debt buyers; law firms specializing in collection litigation; financial institutions that sell charged-off debt at discount; companies that benefit from aggressive collection contact. Impact: Extended FDCPA harassment protections to 87M Americans being contacted by debt collectors on previously uncovered debt types
Who it hurts: 87 million Americans being contacted by debt collectors; borrowers with medical, student, or consumer debt subject to harassment; debtors being pursued for time-barred or previously discharged debts.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Middle Class Borrower Protection Act H.R. 3564
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to repeal a 2023 FHFA mortgage fee adjustment rule that modified risk-based pricing for government-backed mortgages, which critics argued penalized high-credit-score borrowers.
Who it helps: High-credit-score borrowers who paid marginally higher fees under the FHFA risk-based rule; mortgage lenders and originators who prefer the pre-rule fee structure; critics of Biden-era FHFA rule changes.
Who it hurts: First-time homebuyers and lower-credit-score borrowers (below 680) who received fee reductions under the FHFA rule; households in the $40K–$80K income range seeking to purchase their first home. Impact: Reversed FHFA fee changes that lowered mortgage costs for buyers with lower credit scores by an average $40/month
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — June 23, 2023
✓ Yes: 230✗ No: 189
House Roll Call 289 is the final-passage vote; House Roll Call 288 the same day was a separate procedural vote, not reflected here. The Senate never held a floor vote before the 118th Congress adjourned.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Comprehensive Credit Reporting Act H.R. 3621
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to reduce the time negative information remains on credit reports, prohibit reporting of medical debt, and expand consumers' rights to dispute and correct inaccurate credit data.
Who it helps: Credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion) that sell data including medical debt; lenders who use credit scores containing medical debt to justify higher interest rates; debt buyers who purchase medical debt portfolios. Impact: Would have extended medical debt dispute protections for 43M Americans; medical debt is the #1 cause of personal bankruptcy
Who it hurts: 43 million Americans with medical debt on credit reports; consumers with negative credit marks from billing errors; low- and middle-income households for whom medical debt is the primary credit score barrier.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Rescissions Act of 2025 H.R. 4
Bill impact
What it does: The Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R. 4) directed the executive to rescind $8.3 billion in congressionally-approved discretionary spending, primarily cutting USAID foreign assistance programs, international development aid, and green energy investments. Passed narrowly on party-line votes. Democrats universally opposed the bill as an executive overreach that defunded programs benefiting vulnerable populations globally.
Who it helps: Budget hawks; reduces US foreign assistance commitments.
Who it hurts: Recipients of USAID programs, foreign assistance; domestic green energy workers. Impact: Rescinded $8.3B in previously-appropriated federal spending; targeted USAID foreign assistance, green energy programs, and other discretionary funds approved by prior Congress
Sources
Congress.gov H.R.4/119th Congress; Senate roll 2025-Senate-00411 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Social Security Fairness Act H.R. 82
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A 2024 law eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset, which had reduced Social Security benefits for public employees including teachers, firefighters, and police who also received government pensions.
Who it helps: Federal budget controllers who projected $196 billion in additional 10-year Social Security outlays; fiscal deficit hawks opposed to increased Social Security spending; private pension and 401(k) industry benefiting from public sector workers turning to private savings. Impact: Passed House 327-75 on November 12, 2024. Passed Senate 76-20 on December 20, 2024. Signed into law January 5, 2025. 3.1 million public servants received benefit increases averaging $360/month; SSA distributed $17B in retroactive payments by mid-2025
Who it hurts: Public sector retirees: teachers, firefighters, police, and federal workers under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS).
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Tax Relief for American Families Act H.R. 7024
Bill impact
What it does: A 2024 House-passed bill temporarily expanding the Child Tax Credit, restoring expired business tax provisions for research and equipment deductions, and extending several COVID-era tax incentives.
Who it helps: Senate Republicans who blocked the bill to preserve tax negotiation leverage; corporations that benefited from restored R&D expensing provisions without the expanded CTC; wealthy households who preferred tax cuts without the progressive CTC expansion. Impact: Would have lifted 400,000-500,000 children above the poverty line and provided additional support to 16 million children in low-income families
Who it hurts: Low-income families with children, especially those earning below poverty line.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act H.R. 3
Bill impact
What it does: Expands Medicare drug-price negotiation and caps annual out-of-pocket prescription-drug costs.
Who it helps: Medicare beneficiaries and patients facing high prescription-drug costs.
Who it hurts: Drug manufacturers receiving lower negotiated prices on covered medicines.
Sources
Congress.gov · House Clerk
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Passed the House; did not receive Senate passage.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+One Big Beautiful Bill H.R. 1
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A 2025 budget reconciliation bill that extended and expanded the 2017 tax cuts, implemented Medicaid work requirements, reduced SNAP eligibility thresholds, and restructured federal spending priorities.
Who it helps: Households in the top income decile gaining approximately $12,000/year in tax benefits; corporations benefiting from extended and expanded 2017 tax cuts; private equity firms retaining the carried interest loophole; high-income earners benefiting from raised estate tax thresholds.
Who it hurts: Low-income adults on Medicaid, SNAP recipients, student loan borrowers, and an estimated 477,000 healthcare workers at hospitals and clinics losing Medicaid reimbursement volume. Impact: Households in the lowest income decile lose ~4% of resources by 2033; top 10% gain ~$12,000/year
Sources
CBO / Penn Wharton Budget Model / Commonwealth Fund (https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61387)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$61.1M
National Association of Realtors$32.1M
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America$16.3M
American Hospital Association$13.1M
American Chemistry Council$11.2M
American Medical Association$10.7M
Business Roundtable Inc$9.2M
Amazon.com Services Llc$9.1M
Aarp$9.0M
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc (Ahip)$8.2M
Exxon Mobil Corp$8.1M
Nfib (National Federation of Independent Business)$7.7M
Air Transport Association of America, INC. (D/b/a Airlines for America)$6.8M
Google Client Services Llc$6.7M
Comcast Corporation$6.6M
Edison Electric Institute$6.5M
Koch Government Affairs, Llc$6.3M
Boeing Company$6.2M
National Association of Broadcasters$5.9M
Abbvie INC.$5.8M
Meta Platforms, INC. and Various Subsidiaries$5.8M
National Retail Federation$5.2M
National Shooting Sports Foundation$5.2M
Merck & Co Inc$5.1M
Microsoft Corporation$5.0M
Honeywell International$4.8M
Bristol-myers Squibb Company$4.8M
Chevron U.S.A. INC.$4.7M
Visa, INC.$4.6M
General Atomics$4.2M
Ctia-the Wireless Association$4.1M
Pacific Gas and Electric Company$4.0M
American Clean Power Association$4.0M
Independent Community Bankers of America$4.0M
General Motors Company$3.8M
Rai Services Company$3.8M
Nareit$3.6M
Dow Chemical Company dba Dow$3.6M
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (Nreca)$3.6M
National Association of Children's Hospitals (N.a.c.h.)$3.1M
Walmart Inc$3.1M
Verizon Communications Inc and Various Subsidiaries$3.0M
Elevance Health, INC.$3.0M
National Automobile Dealers Association$2.9M
Delta Air Lines Inc$2.9M
Palantir Technologies INC.$2.9M
Dell Technologies Inc$2.9M
Oracle Corporation$2.8M
Ups (United Parcel Service)$2.7M
National Multifamily Housing Council Inc$2.7M
American Honda Motor CO., INC.$2.7M
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers$2.7M
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association$2.7M
American Academy of Family Physicians$2.6M
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc$2.6M
Charter Communications Inc$2.6M
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc$2.6M
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, INC.$2.6M
Citigroup Washington, INC.$2.6M
Applied Materials, Inc$2.6M
Bayer Corporation (Consolidated Report)$2.5M
Jpmorgan Chase Holdings Llc$2.5M
Lyondell Chemical Company$2.4M
Capital One Financial Corporation$2.3M
Alzheimer's Association$2.3M
Gsk (Fka Glaxosmithkline INC.)$2.3M
Coca-cola Company$2.3M
Stanley Black & Decker$2.3M
Liberty Mutual Group$2.3M
Phillips 66$2.2M
National Venture Capital Association$2.2M
Credit Union National Association, INC. dba America's Credit Unions$2.2M
American Electric Power Company, INC. and Affiliated Corporations$2.2M
Walgreen Company$2.1M
American Bankers Association$2.1M
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association$2.1M
Cisco Systems Inc$2.1M
American Dental Association$2.1M
Genworth Financial, INC.$2.1M
Federation of American Hospitals$2.1M
American Beverage Association$2.1M
American Academy of Dermatology Association$2.1M
American Association of Airport Executives$2.0M
Nasdaq Inc$2.0M
U.s. Travel Association$2.0M
American Society of Civil Engineers$2.0M
National Association of Home Builders$1.9M
The Capital Group Companies, INC. and Its Affiliates$1.9M
Greater New York Hospital Association$1.9M
The Cigna Group and Subsidiaries (Formerly Cigna Corporation and Subsidiaries)$1.9M
How Congress voted
House vote — May 22, 2025
✓ Yes: 215✗ No: 214
Senate vote — July 1, 2025
✓ Yes: 51✗ No: 50
House vote — July 3, 2025 (concurring in Senate amendment)
✓ Yes: 218✗ No: 214
Senate 51-50; VP Vance cast the tiebreaking vote.
Signed into law July 4, 2025, as Public Law 119-21.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Inflation Reduction Act H.R. 5376
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 law investing $369 billion in climate and clean energy, granting Medicare authority to negotiate prescription drug prices, extending ACA premium subsidies, and raising the corporate minimum tax to 15%.
Who it helps: Pharmaceutical companies retaining pricing power on drugs not selected for Medicare negotiation; fossil fuel companies with slower mandated transition timelines; corporations that avoided higher taxes proposed in the original Build Back Better framework. Impact: First-ever Medicare drug price negotiation; $2,000 annual out-of-pocket cap on Part D starting 2025
Who it hurts: Medicare enrollees, ACA marketplace participants, low-income households.
Signed into law August 16, 2022, as the Inflation Reduction Act (Public Law 117-169).
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Build Back Better Act H.R. 5376
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A 2021 House-passed $1.75 trillion reconciliation bill investing in climate programs, universal pre-K, expanded Medicaid, paid family leave, housing, and childcare subsidies.
Who it helps: Pharmaceutical companies retaining unilateral drug pricing power; fossil fuel companies avoiding climate transition costs; corporations and households with incomes over $5M spared from the bill's revenue provisions including a 15% corporate minimum tax. Impact: Passed House 220-213 on November 19, 2021; blocked in Senate by Joe Manchin in December 2021 — never signed into law; Medicare drug pricing and climate provisions died with it
Who it hurts: Medicare enrollees, ACA marketplace participants, low-income households.
Senate never held a floor vote on this text -- H.R.5376 was later amended in the Senate to become the Inflation Reduction Act (id=11).
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Lower Costs More Transparency Act H.R. 5378
Bill impact
What it does: A 2023 health care transparency bill requiring hospitals, health insurers, and pharmacy benefit managers to publicly disclose pricing, cost, and rebate information to allow meaningful comparison by patients and payers.
Who it helps: Pharmacy benefit managers (CVS/Caremark, Express Scripts, OptumRx) whose drug rebate arrangements would have been disclosed; hospitals that benefit from opaque pricing; insurers with non-transparent cost structures. Impact: Passed House 320-71 but died in Senate; would have required PBMs to disclose drug rebates and reduce Medicare site-neutral payment disparities that cost patients hundreds per visit
Who it hurts: Patients, Medicare beneficiaries, hospital patients subject to surprise billing.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+National Defense Authorization Act FY2026 S. 1071
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Annual defense authorization bill setting the FY2026 defense budget and policy.
Who it helps: Defense contractors and the Department of Defense receiving the $890.6B authorization; active-duty servicemembers receiving the 3.8% pay raise and expanded family support.
Who it hurts: Deficit/spending-reduction advocates, given the bill authorizes $8B above the requested budget; the bill's own backers claim ~$20B in efficiency savings (per sponsor press releases — claimed, not independently verified).
Key stat: House final passage 309-110 (8 not voting), Roll Call 2025-House-320, Dec 10 2025. Senate final passage 73-19 (3 not voting), Roll Call 2025-Senate-00648 (date not recorded in source data). Signed into law as Public Law No: 119-60. $890.6B authorized for national defense (CRS analysis), $8.0B above the President's request. Includes a 3.8% pay raise for all servicemembers, $1.5B for barracks/family housing construction, $491M for childcare facilities. CBO also issued a direct-spending cost estimate (publication 61935) covering changes to public safety officer benefits, military retirement programs, and National Defense Stockpile disposal authority.
Sources
CRS · CBO · Congress.gov
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$18.0M
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America$8.4M
American Chemistry Council$6.9M
Meta Platforms, INC. and Various Subsidiaries$6.5M
Boeing Company$2.9M
Charter Communications Inc$2.6M
General Atomics$1.9M
Honeywell International$1.9M
Chevron U.S.A. INC.$1.9M
Palantir Technologies INC.$1.6M
Archer Daniels Midland Company$1.3M
Nature Conservancy$1.3M
Association for Accessible Medicines$1.1M
Jpmorgan Chase Holdings Llc$1.1M
Caterpillar Inc$1.1M
Consumer Technology Association$1.1M
American Association of Airport Executives$987K
National Association of Home Builders$910K
Dow Chemical Company dba Dow$910K
Gsk (Fka Glaxosmithkline INC.)$810K
Information Technology Industry Council$720K
Association of American Medical Colleges$708K
National Education Association$670K
Emd Serono Inc$670K
Vanguard Group$650K
Dji Technology, INC.$640K
American Civil Liberties Union$580K
Boston Scientific Corporation$570K
American Trucking Associations$560K
News Media Alliance$480K
Oshkosh Corporation$460K
American Fed of Government Employees Afl-cio$450K
Blue Origin, Llc$450K
Military Officers Association of America$446K
Cummins Inc$437K
Transportation Trades Department Afl-cio$410K
American Clean Power Association$390K
University of California$350K
American Dental Association$350K
American Apparel & Footwear Association$344K
Ursa Major Technologies, INC.$340K
Kellogg, Brown and Root (Kbr)$340K
Itg Brands, Llc (Formerly Fontem Us, INC.)$300K
Fdd Action$290K
Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association$290K
American Land Title Association$270K
3M Company$270K
General Aviation Manufacturers Association$260K
Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation$255K
United Assn of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry$240K
National Collegiate Athletic Association$240K
American Public Power Association$240K
Psiquantum$230K
Cure Sma$225K
Vanderbilt University$220K
Lake Carriers Association$220K
Association of American Universities$217K
Human Rights Campaign$216K
The Ai Policy Network INC.$203K
International Association of Fire Fighters$184K
Tenable Inc$180K
Samsung Sdi America, INC.$170K
Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America Inc$170K
Hawaiian Airlines, INC.$160K
Kropp Holdings, INC.$150K
Competitive Carriers Association$150K
Western Digital Corporation$140K
Cubic Corporation$140K
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees$135K
Robotic Research Opco, Llc (dba Forterra)$130K
Reliable Robotics Corporation$120K
Zero Emission Transportation Association$110K
True Anomaly, INC.$110K
Rice University$110K
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc$94K
Pharmavite Llc$90K
Americans United for Separation of Church and State$90K
Alliance for Retired Americans$90K
Care Action Now, INC.$80K
Twist Bioscience Corporation$75K
Viatris Inc$70K
Rutgers the State University of New Jersey$70K
Tenable, INC.$60K
Pacific Defense Strategies, INC.$60K
Medicom Technologies, Inc$60K
Intl. Assn. of Amusement Pks. & Attrs.$60K
Booz Allen Hamilton, INC.$60K
Bering Straits Native Corporation$60K
Bechtel National, INC.$60K
American Fintech Council$60K
Airports Council International - North America$60K
Airbus Americas, INC.$60K
Human Rights First$60K
United Launch Alliance$50K
Southern Poverty Law Center$50K
National Association of Waterfront Employers$50K
Information Technology Industry Council (Iti)$50K
Gopro INC.$50K
Crowdstrike$50K
Cheniere Energy, INC.$50K
How Congress voted
House vote — December 10, 2025
✓ Yes: 309✗ No: 110
Senate vote
✓ Yes: 73✗ No: 19
Signed into law as Public Law No: 119-60
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
What it does: $95B emergency package: $60.8B for Ukraine (incl. $23B to replenish U.S. weapons stockpiles), $26B for Israel (incl. $9.1B Gaza humanitarian aid), $8.1B for Indo-Pacific/Taiwan.
Who it helps: U.S. defense contractors (Lockheed Martin, RTX, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics) via stockpile-replenishment contracts; Ukrainian and Israeli governments. Impact: Signed into law as Public Law No: 118-50, April 24, 2024. $95B emergency package: $60.8B for Ukraine (incl. $23B to replenish U.S. weapons stockpiles), $26B for Israel (incl. $9.1B Gaza humanitarian aid), $8.1B for Indo-Pacific/Taiwan.
Who it hurts:Not yet assessed.
Sources
ABC News · CNN · Breaking Defense · Congress.gov
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Senate vote — April 23, 2024
✓ Yes: 67✗ No: 15
Signed into law as Public Law No: 118-50
Senate tally: 67 Yea / 15 Nay / 3 Not Voting captured (85 of 100 total). Senate.gov's official record shows 79-18-3; the remaining 15 senators who voted are no longer in Congress and aren't currently tracked in this database's politician roster. Full historical tally: Senate.gov Roll Call 118-2-154.
House passed this package via 4 separate component bills (H.R.8034, 8035, 8036, 8038) and adopted it into H.R.815 by unanimous consent — no House roll call was taken on H.R.815 itself.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Western Hemisphere War Powers Resolution (Dec 2025) H.Con.Res. 61
Bill impact
What it does: Directs the President, pursuant to Section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against presidentially-designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations in the Western Hemisphere — a response to U.S. military strikes on alleged drug-trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and Pacific, conducted without congressional authorization.
Who it helps: Due-process and war-powers accountability advocates, whose concerns about extrajudicial strikes would be addressed; individuals in the Western Hemisphere strike zone who would no longer face strikes without judicial process; reduced risk of broader escalation with Venezuela.
Who it hurts: Administration officials and military who would lose authority to continue the strike campaign against alleged drug-trafficking vessels; framed by critics as a check on expanding executive war power without congressional authorization.
Key stat: Failed in the House 208-214 (5 not voting), Roll Call 2025-House-345, December 17, 2025. At least 21 known U.S. strikes against alleged drug-trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and Pacific had occurred by November 2025 (CNN). The administration designated 19 groups — mostly Latin American drug cartels and gangs — as Foreign Terrorist Organizations in 2025, more than the prior decade combined, under a January 2025 executive order, to justify military action without a formal AUMF.
Sources
CNN · Task & Purpose · Friends Committee on National Legislation · Congress.gov
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Friends Committee on National Legislation$1.0M
J Street$335K
Demand Progress Action, Inc$40K
How Congress voted
House vote — December 17, 2025
✓ Yes: 208✗ No: 214
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Iran War Powers Resolution (Mar 2026) H.Con.Res. 38
Bill impact
What it does: This concurrent resolution directs the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran or any part of the Iranian government or military unless a declaration of war or authorization to use military force for such purpose has been enacted. The resolution specifies that it shall not be construed to prevent the United States from defending itself from imminent attack.
Who it helps: U.S. households facing lower fuel costs and inflation from de-escalation; U.S. service members and their families; Iranian and regional civilians who would face fewer casualties.
Who it hurts: Defense contractors and Middle East oil producers who would lose wartime demand (e.g., Saudi Aramco reported 26% earnings growth in early 2026, per NPR, tied to the conflict); framed by resolution sponsors as testing executive war-making authority.
Key stat: Failed in the House 209-219, Roll Call 2026-House-085, March 5, 2026. Broader context, not necessarily contemporaneous with this specific vote: as of April 15, 2026, the Iran War had cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $113.3B (≈$761/taxpayer), with 22 U.S. service members killed and 624 wounded (WarCosts.org). Brent crude oil surged from ~$70/barrel to a peak of ~$126/barrel (an 80% increase). U.S. households had paid an estimated $527+ in added fuel costs as of August 4, 2026 (ITEP tracker). EIA forecasts $184B in added U.S. oil-consumption costs for 2026 relative to pre-war expectations. AIPAC spent $880,060 lobbying against this resolution (2025 Q2). 324 of 428 House voters (76%) had received AIPAC PAC money — both parties, both sides of the vote, indicating the money did not clearly predict vote direction. UDP (United Democracy Project) — AIPAC's Super PAC — spent $32.4M touching 14 voters on this bill, though this reflects general 2024-cycle primary spending, not money tied specifically to this vote.
AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)$880K
J Street$375K
Demand Progress Action, Inc$40K
Votevets Action Fund, INC.$30K
P Street Project, INC.$20K
Moveon.org Civic Action$20K
A New Policy INC.$10K
How Congress voted
House vote — March 5, 2026
✓ Yes: 209✗ No: 219
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Iran War Powers Resolution (Apr 2026) H.Con.Res. 40
Bill impact
What it does: This concurrent resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a congressional authorization for use of military force against Iran. Elements of the U.S. Armed Forces needed to defend the United States, an ally, or a partner from imminent attack are not covered by this requirement provided the President complies with the 60-day removal provision of the War Powers Resolution.
Who it helps: U.S. households facing lower fuel costs and inflation from de-escalation; U.S. service members and their families; Iranian and regional civilians who would face fewer casualties.
Who it hurts: Defense contractors and Middle East oil producers who would lose wartime demand (e.g., Saudi Aramco reported 26% earnings growth in early 2026, per NPR, tied to the conflict); framed by resolution sponsors as testing executive war-making authority.
Key stat: Failed in the House 211-214 (1 abstain, 3 not voting), Roll Call 2026-House-114, April 16, 2026. Broader context, not necessarily contemporaneous with this specific vote: as of April 15, 2026, the Iran War had cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $113.3B (≈$761/taxpayer), with 22 U.S. service members killed and 624 wounded (WarCosts.org). Brent crude oil surged from ~$70/barrel to a peak of ~$126/barrel (an 80% increase). U.S. households had paid an estimated $527+ in added fuel costs as of August 4, 2026 (ITEP tracker). EIA forecasts $184B in added U.S. oil-consumption costs for 2026 relative to pre-war expectations.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act H.R. 6968
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Bans importation into the United States of Russian energy products (crude oil, petroleum products, LNG, coal), codifying President Biden's executive order banning Russian energy imports in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Who it helps: Ukraine and allied sanctions goals, by cutting a Russian war-funding revenue stream; non-Russian oil exporters gaining displaced U.S. market share.
Who it hurts: U.S. refiners configured for Russian heavy crude; modest upward pressure on fuel prices from lost import volume.
Key stat: Russian crude and petroleum products made up roughly 8% of U.S. crude oil imports and about 3% of total U.S. petroleum imports before the ban (EIA, 2021 data).
House vote — April 7, 2022 (concurring in Senate amendment)
✓ Yes: 413✗ No: 9
Signed into law April 8, 2022, as Public Law 117-109.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Disapproving EPA Oil & Gas Methane Emission Rule S.J.Res. 14
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Nullifies a September 2020 EPA rule (a Trump-administration rollback) that had eliminated methane-emission limits on oil and gas transmission and storage facilities. Passage reinstates federal methane emission standards for the sector under the Clean Air Act.
Who it helps: Communities near oil and gas facilities and public health broadly, since methane is both a potent greenhouse gas and a marker for co-emitted air pollutants.
Who it hurts: Oil and gas operators, who face compliance and leak-detection/repair costs the 2020 rule had removed.
Key stat: The nullified 2020 rule had eliminated methane emission limits for the oil/gas transmission and storage segments and removed EPA's obligation to regulate methane pollution from existing sources (EPA rule text, 85 Fed. Reg. 57018, Sept. 14, 2020).
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · EPA rule text (https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/14)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Senate vote — April 28, 2021
✓ Yes: 52✗ No: 42
House vote — June 25, 2021
✓ Yes: 229✗ No: 191
Signed into law June 30, 2021, as Public Law 117-23.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Protecting Europe's Energy Security Implementation Act S. 3436
Failed
Bill impact
What it does: Would have required the President to sanction corporate officers and entities responsible for planning, constructing, or operating the Nord Stream 2 pipeline within 15 days of enactment.
Who it helps: Ukraine and Eastern European allies, by denying Russia the pipeline's geopolitical leverage over European gas supply.
Who it hurts: German and other European entities and officials tied to Nord Stream 2's construction and operation, who would have faced U.S. sanctions.
Key stat: Nord Stream 2 had a planned capacity of 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year, roughly doubling direct Russia-to-Germany pipeline gas capacity. Germany independently suspended the pipeline's certification days after this vote, following Russia's invasion of Ukraine -- a separate action, not caused by this bill.
Cloture failed to reach the 60-vote threshold; the bill never received a Senate floor vote on its substance, and there was no House action.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Disapproving EV Charger Buy America Waiver Rule S.J.Res. 38
Vetoed
Bill impact
What it does: Would have nullified a Federal Highway Administration rule temporarily waiving Buy America domestic-manufacturing requirements for electric vehicle chargers, ending the waiver immediately and requiring full domestic sourcing right away rather than on the rule's original phase-in schedule.
Who it helps: Domestic steel and manufacturing interests and Buy America compliance advocates.
Who it hurts: EV charger deployment timelines and the $7.5B Bipartisan Infrastructure Law NEVI charger-funding program, which depended on the transition window the waiver provided.
Key stat: The waived Buy America requirements applied to component manufacturing through June 30, 2024, and to final assembly through October 1, 2024, for chargers funded under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's $7.5B NEVI program.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · FHWA rule text · White House SAP (https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/38)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Senate vote — November 8, 2023
✓ Yes: 50✗ No: 48
House vote — January 11, 2024
✓ Yes: 209✗ No: 198
Senate override attempt vote — February 29, 2024
✓ Yes: 50✗ No: 47
Vetoed by President Biden January 24, 2024.
Senate override attempt fell short of the two-thirds majority required (67 needed).
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
What it does: Nullifies a December 2024 Bureau of Land Management rule that had shrunk the area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Coastal Plain available for oil and gas leasing. Passage reinstates the broader 2020 leasing footprint.
Who it helps: Oil and gas industry and Alaska state revenue/jobs interests, via expanded ANWR leasing access.
Who it hurts: Arctic wildlife and Gwich'in communities dependent on the Porcupine caribou herd; conservation advocates.
Key stat: The nullified 2024 rule had reduced ANWR Coastal Plain leasing availability from roughly 1.6 million acres (under the 2020 Record of Decision) to about 400,000 acres open, withdrawing roughly 1.2 million acres from oil and gas leasing.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · BLM rule text (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/131)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
American Petroleum Institute$1.9M
Nfib (National Federation of Independent Business)$1.2M
League of Conservation Voters$280K
Alaska Wilderness League Action$10K
How Congress voted
House vote — November 18, 2025
✓ Yes: 217✗ No: 209
Senate vote — December 4, 2025
✓ Yes: 49✗ No: 45
Signed into law December 11, 2025, as Public Law 119-52.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
What it does: Nullifies a September 2024 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management rule requiring offshore oil and gas operators to conduct archaeological surveys before permit approval on the Outer Continental Shelf. Passage removes that survey requirement.
Who it helps: Offshore oil and gas developers, via faster and cheaper permitting.
Who it hurts: Marine archaeological and historic-preservation interests (shipwrecks, submerged cultural sites), which lose a pre-permit review step.
Key stat: The nullified rule required offshore oil/gas operators to survey and report on potential archaeological resources at least 50 years old before BOEM would approve exploration or development permits on the Outer Continental Shelf.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · BOEM rule text (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/11)
Society for American Archaeologyamount undisclosed
How Congress voted
Senate vote — February 25, 2025
✓ Yes: 54✗ No: 44
House vote — March 5, 2025
✓ Yes: 221✗ No: 202
House vote included 1 Present.
Signed into law March 14, 2025, as Public Law 119-3.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Terminating the National Energy Emergency S.J.Res. 10
Failed
Bill impact
What it does: Would have terminated the national emergency relating to energy declared by President Trump on January 20, 2025 (Executive Order 14156), which invokes emergency authorities to fast-track energy infrastructure permitting.
Who it helps: Communities and environmental groups affected by permitting shortcuts that bypass standard environmental review.
Who it hurts: Energy developers relying on the emergency declaration's expedited permitting authority, who would have lost that fast-track track.
Key stat: Executive Order 14156 (Jan. 20, 2025) directed federal agencies to use emergency and other authorities to expedite energy infrastructure approval, particularly in the Northeast, West Coast, and Alaska.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · Bloomberg Government (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/10)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
League of Conservation Voters$170K
Earthjustice Action$93K
National Right Life Committee$76K
How Congress voted
Senate vote — February 26, 2025
✓ Yes: 47✗ No: 52
No House vote -- did not advance past the Senate.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Terminating the National Energy Emergency (2nd Attempt) S.J.Res. 71
Failed
Bill impact
What it does: Would have terminated the same national energy emergency (Executive Order 14156) targeted by S.J.Res.10 (id=121); reintroduced after that first attempt failed.
Who it helps: Communities and environmental groups affected by permitting shortcuts that bypass standard environmental review.
Who it hurts: Energy developers relying on the emergency declaration's expedited permitting authority, who would have lost that fast-track track.
Key stat: Second attempt at the same termination sought by S.J.Res.10 (id=121, failed February 2025) -- Executive Order 14156 remained in effect at the time of this vote.
What it does: Would have nullified an August 2025 IRS rule that tightened "beginning of construction" requirements for wind and solar facilities to qualify for Clean Electricity Production and Investment Tax Credits, restoring the looser standard that let more in-progress projects qualify.
Who it helps: Wind and solar developers with projects that had spent money on a facility but had not yet physically broken ground. Impact: IRS Notice 2025-42 (Aug. 2025) requires wind/solar projects to show actual physical construction had begun to qualify for the Clean Electricity Production and Investment Tax Credits, replacing the prior standard that also allowed qualification via spending at least 5% of a project's total cost by the deadline.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified. Nullifying the rule would restore easier tax-credit eligibility for in-progress wind/solar projects without an identifiable losing side beyond a modest increase in federal tax-credit outlays.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · Bloomberg Government · Tax Notes (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/107)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Senate motion to proceed vote — March 25, 2026
✓ Yes: 47✗ No: 53
Motion to proceed rejected on a party-line vote; the bill never reached a substantive floor vote.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
What it does: Would have nullified a July 2025 EPA rule that extended compliance deadlines for methane emission standards at oil and gas facilities, restoring the original, earlier deadlines.
Who it helps: Public health and climate advocates and communities near oil and gas facilities, via faster methane-control compliance.
Who it hurts: Oil and gas operators, who would have lost the extended compliance runway the rule had granted.
Key stat: The nullified EPA rule (published July 31, 2025) extended compliance deadlines for methane leak detection, control devices, and the Methane Super Emitter Program at oil and gas facilities.
Motion to proceed rejected; the bill never reached a substantive floor vote.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+ADVANCE Act (Nuclear Energy) S. 870
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Reforms Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing to accelerate deployment of advanced nuclear reactors -- faster licensing review, reduced regulatory fees for advanced-reactor applicants, and an accelerated licensing pathway for reactors sited at existing nuclear facilities. Enacted as part of a combined bill also reauthorizing the U.S. Fire Administration and firefighter assistance grant programs.
Who it helps: The nuclear industry and advanced-reactor developers; proponents of nuclear power as a clean baseload energy source.
Who it hurts: Nuclear-safety watchdog groups who argue faster NRC review and reduced licensing fees weaken regulatory scrutiny.
Key stat: Directs the NRC to establish an accelerated licensing review process for advanced reactors at existing nuclear sites and to reduce regulatory fees for advanced-reactor license applicants.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · S&P Global · EPW Committee (https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/870)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — May 8, 2024
✓ Yes: 393✗ No: 13
Senate vote — June 18, 2024
✓ Yes: 88✗ No: 2
Signed into law July 9, 2024, as Public Law 118-67. Also known as the ADVANCE Act; enacted jointly with the Fire Grants and Safety Act reauthorization, its legislative vehicle.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Lower Energy Costs Act H.R. 1
Bill impact
What it does: A 2023 House-passed Republican energy package that fast-tracks permitting for oil, gas, and mining projects on federal land, reverses Inflation Reduction Act increases to federal oil and gas royalty rates, repeals the IRA's methane emissions fee program, and bars the President from rescinding existing mineral leases and permits without a statutory basis.
Who it helps: Oil, gas, and mining companies operating on federal land, via faster permitting, lower royalty rates, and repeal of the methane fee.
Who it hurts: Federal royalty revenue (reduced from IRA-raised rates); methane-emissions accountability mechanisms; environmental review processes for energy projects.
Key stat: Includes provisions barring rescission of existing federal mineral leases/permits absent a statutory basis or a compliance failure by the leaseholder; repeals both the IRA's Methane Emissions Reduction Program incentives and its separate charge on methane emissions from reporting facilities.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · CBS News · National League of Cities (https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — March 30, 2023
✓ Yes: 225✗ No: 204
House passed its own version; the Senate never held a floor vote before the 118th Congress adjourned.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Gas Stove Protection and Freedom Act H.R. 1615
Bill impact
What it does: Prohibits the Consumer Product Safety Commission from using federal funds to regulate gas stoves as a banned hazardous product, and bars any CPSC rule that would substantially raise the average price of gas stoves.
Who it helps: Gas stove manufacturers and consumers who prefer gas stoves, who would face fewer new efficiency/safety regulatory costs.
Who it hurts: CPSC's regulatory authority over indoor air quality/safety standards for gas appliances, which the bill would restrict.
Key stat: Followed a 2023 CPSC commissioner's comments about potential future regulation of gas stove indoor air pollution, which the agency itself said would not amount to an outright ban -- the bill responded to a regulatory possibility CPSC leadership had already publicly disclaimed.
House passed; the Senate never held a floor vote before the 118th Congress adjourned. A near-identical companion bill, H.R.1640 (Save Our Gas Stoves Act), passed the House the same week by a similar margin (204-153).
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025 H.R. 1949
Bill impact
What it does: Repeals Natural Gas Act provisions requiring Department of Energy approval for LNG export/import terminal siting and construction, giving the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission exclusive authority to approve or deny such facilities. Preserves presidential authority to restrict trade with sanctioned foreign governments.
Who it helps: LNG export developers and the domestic natural gas industry, via a single-agency (FERC-only) permitting pathway instead of a DOE-plus-FERC dual-approval process.
Who it hurts: DOE's public-interest review role in LNG export approvals, which is eliminated -- a process previously used, e.g., during the Biden administration's 2024 pause on new LNG export permits.
Key stat: Responds directly to the Biden administration's January 2024 pause on new LNG export permit approvals, which cited climate and domestic price concerns; removing DOE from the approval chain would prevent a future administration from repeating that kind of pause.
Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, INC.$260K
Earthjustice Action$180K
Domtar Corporation Fka Paper Excellence Holdings Corporation Fka Domtar$100K
Gcf Us Holdings, Llc$50K
National Taxpayers Union$30K
County of Kern$20K
How Congress voted
House vote — November 20, 2025
✓ Yes: 214✗ No: 186
House passed; the Senate has not yet voted. A near-identical 118th Congress predecessor, H.R.7176, passed the House 187-169 in February 2024 but died when that Congress adjourned.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Disapproving EPA MATS Coal/Oil-Fired Power Plant Rule Repeal S.J.Res. 188
Failed
Bill impact
What it does: Would have nullified the Trump EPA's February 2026 repeal of 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) updates, which had strengthened emissions limits for mercury and other toxic metals from coal- and oil-fired power plants and required continuous emissions monitoring.
Who it helps: Communities near coal- and oil-fired power plants and public health broadly, who would have retained the stricter 2024 mercury/toxics limits and monitoring requirements.
Who it hurts: Coal- and oil-fired power plant operators, who benefit from the Trump EPA's repeal by avoiding the 2024 rule's stricter emissions-control and continuous-monitoring costs.
Key stat: The repealed 2024 rule had required continuous emissions monitoring systems and applied the same mercury/toxics standards to lignite-fired plants as other coal plants; a separate April 2025 presidential proclamation had already exempted 68 coal-fired units from the MATS rule for two years before the full repeal.
Motion to proceed rejected on a party-line vote; the resolution never reached a substantive floor vote.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Electric Supply Chain Act H.R. 3638
Bill impact
What it does: Requires the Department of Energy to periodically assess and report to Congress on the electricity generation and transmission supply chain -- including component shortages, barriers to domestic critical-minerals processing capacity, and emerging vulnerabilities -- with the first report due within one year of enactment.
Who it helps: Grid reliability planning and domestic electrical-component manufacturers/critical-minerals processors, who gain a recurring federal assessment identifying supply chain gaps to target for investment. Impact: Comes amid a period of rising U.S. electricity demand growth (data centers, AI, electrification) straining transformer, cable, and grid-component supply chains nationally.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- this is a reporting/assessment mandate on DOE, not a bill with an identifiable losing side.
American Electric Power Company, INC. and Affiliated Corporations$895K
Firstenergy Corp$760K
Corporate Energy Buyers Association (Fka Clean Energy Buyers Association)$720K
Puget Sound Energy$640K
Cms Energy Corp$530K
National Electrical Manufacturers Association$450K
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation$390K
Rolls-royce North America and Its Affiliates$380K
Itc Holdings Corp$380K
Portland General Electric$370K
Centerpoint Energy$300K
Ppl Corporation$170K
How Congress voted
House vote — December 11, 2025
✓ Yes: 264✗ No: 157
House passed; the Senate has not yet voted.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Build More Hydro Act S. 1020
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Extends the FERC-authorized construction-start deadline for certain hydropower projects licensed before March 13, 2020, giving developers more time to begin construction without losing their federal license.
Who it helps: Hydropower project developers holding licenses issued before March 2020, who avoid losing their FERC authorization due to construction delays. Impact: Passed the Senate by unanimous consent (no recorded roll call) and the House 394-14; signed into law as the "Build More Hydro Act."
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- a licensing-deadline extension for already-approved projects.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · National Hydropower Association · Troutman Pepper Locke (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1020)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Corporate Energy Buyers Association (Fka Clean Energy Buyers Association)$490K
National Hydropower Association$220K
Farmers Educational Cooperative Union of America$100K
Nelson Energy, Llc$60K
Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund Xlii, Llc$50K
Old Harbor Native Corporation$40K
Northwest Public Power Association (Nwppa)$30K
Agilitas Energy INC.$20K
How Congress voted
House vote — April 21, 2026
✓ Yes: 394✗ No: 14
Senate passed by unanimous consent in July 2025 -- no roll call recorded.
Signed into law May 11, 2026.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Homeowner Energy Freedom Act H.R. 4758
Bill impact
What it does: Repeals three Inflation Reduction Act programs: the High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Program for low- and moderate-income household electrification projects, the home energy efficiency contractor training grant program, and financial assistance for states/localities adopting updated energy-conservation building codes.
Who it helps: Federal budget authority (an estimated $300M in unobligated program balances redirected) and building/construction interests opposed to mandatory updated energy codes.
Who it hurts: Low- and moderate-income households that would have used the electrification rebate program; state/local governments that would have received the $1B in building-code adoption grants; home-efficiency contractors in the training grant program.
Key stat: CBO estimated the bill would cut roughly $300M in unobligated IRA program balances and eliminate $1B in grants for states/localities to adopt more efficient building codes.
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc$2.6M
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association$1.8M
Biotechnology Innovation Organization$1.5M
National Association of Home Builders$910K
Amerihealth Caritas Services, Llc$610K
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center$500K
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc$497K
National Community Pharmacists Association$412K
Nemours Foundation - a Florida Not-for-profit Corporation$401K
A.o. Smith Corporation$350K
Enbridge (U.s.) Inc$308K
American Heart Association$300K
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan$269K
Spark Therapeutics, INC.$250K
Alliance for Regenerative Medicine$250K
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia$240K
National Marrow Donor Program$240K
Basf Corporation$200K
Breakthrough T1d (Formerly Known As Jdrf Intl.)$180K
Pennsylvania State University$150K
Cure Sma$150K
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation$120K
Blood Cancer United (Formerly Reported Asthe Leukemia and Lymphoma Society)$110K
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons$105K
California Children's Hospital Association$100K
Children's Hospital Boston$90K
Children's Hospital and Health System, INC.$80K
Breakthrough T1d (Fka Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International)$80K
American Council for an Energy-efficient Economy$80K
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions$72K
Muscular Dystrophy Association, INC.$60K
Hospital & Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania$60K
Epilepsy Foundation$60K
Soleno Therapeutics, INC.$50K
Orchard Therapeutics North America$50K
National Organization for Rare Disorders Inc (Nord)$50K
National Energy & Fuels Institute$50K
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta$50K
Virginia Commonwealth University$40K
Stealth Biotherapeutics INC.$40K
Nemours Children's Health$40K
Medicaid Health Plans of America$40K
Cleveland Clinic Foundation$40K
Vanderbilt University Medical Center$30K
Ssm Health$30K
Praxis Precision Medicines$30K
National Taxpayers Union$30K
Lg Electronics Usa, INC.$30K
Boston Children's Hospital$30K
National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners$24K
Sickle Cell Disease Association of America$20K
Nyu Langone Hospitals (Formerly Nyu Hospitals Center)$20K
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, INC.$20K
Everylife Foundation for Rare Diseases$20K
St. Baldrick's Foundationamount undisclosed
How Congress voted
House vote — February 25, 2026
✓ Yes: 210✗ No: 197
House passed; the Senate has not yet voted.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Iran-China Energy Sanctions Act of 2023 H.R. 5923
Bill impact
What it does: Requires the President to periodically determine whether any Chinese financial institution has purchased petroleum or petroleum products from Iran, and restricts U.S. correspondent/payable-through banking accounts for institutions that have. Requires annual reports to Congress on Chinese purchases of Iranian oil through 2029.
Who it helps: U.S. sanctions enforcement goals against Iranian oil revenue; the broader Iran sanctions regime.
Who it hurts: Chinese financial institutions and "teapot" refineries involved in processing discounted Iranian crude, which lose access to U.S. correspondent banking relationships.
Key stat: Small independent Chinese "teapot" refineries had become a major buyer of discounted Iranian crude and a significant revenue source for Tehran, per committee discussion of the bill.
House passed; the Senate never held a floor vote before the 118th Congress adjourned.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+GENIUS Act S. 1582
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, a 2025 bill creating a federal licensing and reserve-requirement framework for stablecoin issuers to operate in the United States.
Who it helps: Payment stablecoin issuers (Tether, Circle) gaining U.S. legal authorization; large technology companies that could issue stablecoins under the framework; banks entering the stablecoin market; fintech companies integrating payment stablecoins.
Who it hurts: Retail stablecoin holders, crypto users, fintech payment users.
Key stat: First federal stablecoin law — requires 1:1 backing and redemption rights for holders, but Consumer Reports and NY AG warned it lacks fraud protections and lets big tech operate like banks
Sources
CRS / Consumer Reports / Gibson Dunn (https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13174)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Nfib (National Federation of Independent Business)$3.0M
Independent Community Bankers of America$2.7M
Citigroup Washington, INC.$2.5M
Credit Union National Association, INC. dba America's Credit Unions$2.2M
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association$2.1M
American Council of Life Insurers$1.9M
Visa, INC.$1.8M
Consumer Bankers Association$1.6M
Mastercard Worldwide$1.6M
Managed Funds Association$1.3M
Solana Policy Institute$1.2M
Ernst & Young Llp (Washington Council Ernst & Young)$1.2M
Food Marketplace Inc$1.1M
Block INC.$1.1M
Blockchain Association$1.1M
Coinbase, INC.$980K
Payward INC.$930K
National Restaurant Association$790K
Lowe's Companies INC.$720K
Bank Policy Institute$560K
Electronic Transactions Association$550K
Live Oak Bank$540K
Pilot Travel Centers Llc$430K
Kpmg Llp$430K
Southwest Airlines$410K
Target Corporation$270K
Pathward, N.a.$270K
S&p Global INC. (F/k/a Mcgraw Hill Financial INC.)$260K
American Airlines, INC.$240K
Idemia Identity & Security Usa Llc$230K
Sofi Technologies, INC.$190K
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$157K
Americans for Financial Reform$150K
Filecoin Foundation$140K
Community Bankers Association of Illinois$130K
Visa$110K
The American Council of Life Insurers$110K
Circle$110K
Wintermute Trading LTD.$100K
Paypal, INC.$100K
Multicoin Capital$100K
Jpmorgan Chase Holdings, Llc$100K
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated$100K
Gowest Credit Union Association$100K
Electronic Payments Coalition$100K
Northern Trust Corporation$90K
Transparency International U.s. (a Project of the Fund for Constitutional Govt)$80K
Tether Operations, S.a. De C.v.$80K
Center for Responsible Lending a Supporting Corp of Ctr for Community Self-help$80K
Mastercard$70K
Federated Hermes, INC.$70K
Exodus Movement, INC.$70K
Coinflip$70K
Visa Usa, INC.$60K
Visa INC.$60K
Polygon Labs Services (Switzerland) Ag$60K
Paradigm Operations Lp$60K
Defi Education Fund$60K
Defense Credit Union Council$60K
Consensys Software INC.$60K
Citigroup Washington INC.$60K
Block, INC.$60K
American Fintech Council$60K
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma)$50K
Moonpay Usa Llc$50K
Lmax Group$50K
Jp Morgan Chase Holdings, Llc$50K
H&r Block Management, Llc$50K
Crypto Council for Innovation$50K
The Clearing House Association$40K
Ledger$40K
Fact Coalition (a Project of the Fund for Constitutional Government)$40K
Alliance Defending Freedom$40K
Chainalysis INC.$34K
Ava Labs, INC.$32K
Wisdomtree Digital Management, INC.$30K
Satoshi Action Fund$30K
Metrika, INC.$23K
P Street Project, INC.$20K
Federal Hall Policy Advisors, Llc on Behalf of Solana Policy Institute$20K
Avalanche Bvi, INC.$16K
Standard Chartered Bank$10K
Connect Strategy Llc (on Behalf of Cryptex Finance)$10K
Independent Bankers Association of Texas$7K
Wakefern Food Corp.amount undisclosed
Federal Money Services Business Association INC.amount undisclosed
How Congress voted
Senate vote — June 17, 2025
✓ Yes: 68✗ No: 30
House vote — July 17, 2025
✓ Yes: 308✗ No: 122
Senate also adopted cloture 66-32 on May 19, 2025, ahead of the June 17 final-passage vote shown above.
Signed into law July 18, 2025.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+CFPB Overdraft Rule Repeal S.J.Res. 18
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A Congressional Review Act resolution overturning a CFPB rule that capped overdraft fees at $5 for the largest banks, a regulation projected to save consumers approximately $5 billion annually.
Who it helps: The largest U.S. banks — JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and U.S. Bancorp — which collectively collect $3–4 billion annually in overdraft fees; banking industry lobbying groups that fought the CFPB cap.
Who it hurts: Households that overdraft accounts at large banks, disproportionately low-income, Black, and Hispanic consumers. Impact: Repealing the CFPB rule costs overdrafting households $225/year and preserves $5B annually in bank overdraft revenue
Credit Union National Association, INC. dba America's Credit Unions$2.4M
Wells Fargo & Company$1.3M
United Services Automobile Association$1.1M
Bank of America Corporation$350K
Americans for Financial Reform$300K
Americans for Tax Reform$120K
Conference of Provincials of North America$20K
U.s. Public Interest Research Group$10K
Demand Progress Action$10K
How Congress voted
Senate vote — March 27, 2025
✓ Yes: 52✗ No: 48
House vote — April 9, 2025
✓ Yes: 217✗ No: 211
Signed into law May 9, 2025.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Disapproving OCC Bank Merger Review Rule S.J.Res. 13
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A Congressional Review Act resolution (S.J.Res.13, 119th Congress) disapproving the OCC's 2024 Bank Merger Act review framework, which required merger applicants to show the transaction better serves the convenience and needs of the community -- including low-income communities and communities of color -- and added scrutiny of competition and financial-stability risk. Repealing it restored the OCC's prior streamlined, expedited merger-approval process. Signed into law as Public Law 119-19, June 20 2025.
Who it helps: Large banks seeking faster merger approval with less community-impact review.
Who it hurts: Customers of merging banks in low-income and underserved communities, who lose the heightened review of whether mergers serve their needs. Impact: Passed Senate 52-47 on May 7, 2025. Passed House 220-207 on May 20, 2025. Signed into law June 20, 2025. Repealed the 2024 OCC rule requiring banks to demonstrate mergers serve community needs before approval; restored expedited merger review with reduced scrutiny of impact on low-income communities
Signed into law June 20, 2025, as Public Law 119-19.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+CLARITY Act H.R. 3633
Bill impact
What it does: A 2025 bill establishing a comprehensive federal regulatory framework for digital assets and cryptocurrencies, clarifying SEC and CFTC jurisdictional boundaries and creating disclosure and registration requirements.
Who it helps: Cryptocurrency exchanges (Coinbase, Binance.US, Kraken) gaining CFTC regulatory clarity; blockchain developers who structure tokens as commodities to avoid SEC oversight; institutional crypto investors seeking certainty for U.S. operations.
Who it hurts: Retail crypto investors; digital asset market participants.
Key stat: Passed House 294-134; state securities regulators and investor advocates warned it could weaken retail protections by narrowing SEC jurisdiction over digital assets
Sources
CRS / Paul Hastings / Blockchain Council (https://www.paulhastings.com/insights/crypto-policy-tracker/update-on-crypto-market-structure-legislation-senate-banking-draft-and-clarity-act)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association$7.1M
Independent Community Bankers of America$4.0M
American Bankers Association$3.7M
Credit Union National Association, INC. dba America's Credit Unions$3.3M
American Association for Justice$3.1M
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc$2.6M
Jpmorgan Chase Holdings Llc$2.3M
Coinbase, INC.$2.0M
Visa, INC.$1.8M
Merck & Co Inc$1.7M
National Venture Capital Association$1.6M
Wells Fargo & Company$1.4M
Financial Services Forum$1.3M
Managed Funds Association$1.3M
Solana Policy Institute$1.2M
Blockchain Association$1.1M
Fmr Llc$1.0M
Bank Policy Institute$1.0M
Payward INC.$930K
Crypto Council for Innovation$930K
Cme Group Inc$840K
Paradigm Operations Lp$830K
Sofi Technologies, INC.$790K
Jump Crypto Holdings Llc$670K
Franklin Resources, INC. (Franklin Templeton) and Affiliates$590K
Deloitte Llp$580K
Paypal Inc$567K
Block INC.$510K
Becton Dickinson and Company$485K
Kpmg Llp$430K
Foris Dax, Inc & Its Affiliated Entities D/b/a Crypto.com$430K
Ripple$410K
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists$400K
Standard Chartered Bank$390K
American Dental Association$390K
Citadel Enterprise Americas Services Llc$380K
Options Clearing Corporation$370K
Defi Education Fund$350K
Citizens Financial Group Inc$350K
Circle$330K
Filecoin Foundation$300K
Americans for Financial Reform$300K
Decentralization Research Center$280K
Bank of America Corporation$280K
Western Alliance Bancorporation$270K
Pathward, N.a.$270K
Hsbc Technology and Services Usa INC.$270K
S&p Global INC. (F/k/a Mcgraw Hill Financial INC.)$260K
International Swaps & Derivatives Association Inc$258K
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated$250K
Futures Industry Association$250K
A16z Capital Management Llc$240K
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute$230K
Anchor Labs, INC.$230K
Worldpay$220K
Mysten Labs, INC.$210K
Alternative Investment Management Association$190K
Cme Group, INC.$180K
Ava Labs INC.$170K
American Academy of Pediatrics$170K
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$157K
Uniswap Labs$155K
Multicoin Capital$150K
Smartcontract INC.$140K
Payward Inc D/b/a Kraken$140K
Exodus Movement, INC.$140K
Community Bankers Association of Illinois$130K
Flexa INC.$120K
Coinflip$120K
Anchorage Digital Bank$120K
Americans for Tax Reform$120K
Visa$110K
Notarize, INC. dba Proof.com$110K
American Transaction Processors Coalition$110K
Wintermute Trading LTD.$100K
The Institute of Internal Auditors$100K
Paypal, INC.$100K
Moonpay Usa Llc$100K
Lmax Group$100K
Gowest Credit Union Association$100K
Electronic Payments Coalition$100K
Xapo Bank Limited$80K
Transparency International U.s. (a Project of the Fund for Constitutional Govt)$80K
Tether Operations, S.a. De C.v.$80K
Pudgy Penguins, INC.$80K
Chamber of Progress$80K
Center for Responsible Lending a Supporting Corp of Ctr for Community Self-help$80K
Bank Policy Institute (Fka the Financial Services Roundtable)$80K
American Securities Association$80K
Visa Usa, INC.$60K
Polygon Labs Services (Switzerland) Ag$60K
Fact Coalition (a Project of the Fund for Constitutional Government)$60K
Consensys Software INC.$60K
Block, INC.$60K
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma)$50K
Jpmorgan Chase Holdings, Llc$50K
The Clearing House Association$40K
Ledger Sas$40K
Ledger$40K
Federated Hermes, INC.$40K
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+SAB 121 Repeal H.J.Res. 109
Bill impact
What it does: A Congressional Review Act resolution overturning SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, which required financial institutions holding crypto assets on behalf of customers to record those assets as liabilities on their balance sheets.
Who it helps: Banks and financial institutions (JPMorgan, Bank of America, Fidelity) freed from on-balance-sheet treatment of crypto holdings; crypto exchanges seeking bank custodianship partnerships; institutional crypto industry broadly.
Who it hurts: Crypto investors using custodial services at banks and financial institutions.
Key stat: Passed House 228-182 on May 8, 2024. Passed Senate 60-38 on May 16, 2024. House failed to override presidential veto 228-184 on July 11, 2024 (2/3 required). Passed both chambers but vetoed by Biden; SEC later rescinded SAB 121 in Jan 2025 — removing accounting safeguard that consumer advocates said protected retail crypto holders
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+FIT21 H.R. 4763
Bill impact
What it does: The Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, a 2024 law establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets, defining when crypto tokens fall under SEC versus CFTC oversight.
Who it helps: Cryptocurrency exchanges and platforms gaining CFTC jurisdiction over most tokens; blockchain developers who can structure tokens as commodities; institutional crypto firms seeking regulatory clarity for product launches.
Who it hurts: Retail crypto investors, approximately 52 million Americans who own digital assets.
Key stat: SEC Chair Gensler warned FIT21 would 'undermine decades of precedent regarding the oversight of investment contracts, putting investors and capital markets at immeasurable risk'
Sources
SEC / White House SAP / CRS (https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2024/06/house-passes-digital-asset-market-structure-legislation)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+NLRB Joint Employer Rule S.J.Res. 42
Bill impact
What it does: Repealed the NLRB rule that made franchisors jointly liable for labor violations by franchisees.
Who it helps: Franchisors in fast food and hospitality industries, no longer jointly liable.
Who it hurts: Franchise workers, whose labor protections weakened across fast food and hospitality industries.
Sources
NLRB · Congress.gov
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No vote data loaded for this bill.
How did your senator vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
What it does: A Congressional Review Act resolution overturning an NLRB rule that broadened the definition of joint employer, which would have increased legal liability for companies using contractors, staffing agencies, or franchisees.
Who it helps: Franchise chains (McDonald's, Subway, major hotel chains) shielded from joint employer liability; large corporations using staffing agencies and subcontractors; industries with high subcontracting rates including construction, logistics, and food service.
Who it hurts: Approximately 1 million franchise and contract workers who would have gained collective bargaining rights under the expanded joint employer definition; workers at companies using staffing agencies and subcontractors. Impact: Overturned rule that would have given collective bargaining rights to 1M franchise and contract workers
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — January 12, 2024
✓ Yes: 206✗ No: 177
Senate vote — April 10, 2024
✓ Yes: 50✗ No: 48
Vetoed by President Biden May 3, 2024.
House veto override attempt failed 214-191 on May 7, 2024 (two-thirds majority required).
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Disapproving DOL ESG Investment Rule H.J.Res. 30
Vetoed
Bill impact
What it does: A Congressional Review Act resolution overturning a Department of Labor rule that had explicitly permitted retirement plan managers to consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in investment decisions.
Who it helps: Oil and gas companies and coal producers whose stocks are excluded from ESG screens; traditional non-ESG financial products companies competing for 401(k) assets; politicians and organizations that oppose ESG investing on ideological grounds.
Who it hurts: 150 million retirement savers with 401(k) accounts who lost the explicit right to have plan managers consider ESG factors — including climate risk — in investment decisions affecting $12 trillion in assets. Impact: Overturned rule protecting 150M retirement savers' ability to include ESG funds across $12T in 401k assets
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — February 28, 2023
✓ Yes: 216✗ No: 204
Senate vote — March 1, 2023
✓ Yes: 50✗ No: 46
Vetoed by President Biden March 20, 2023; House override attempt failed March 23, 2023.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Paycheck Fairness Act H.R. 7
Failed
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to strengthen the Equal Pay Act by prohibiting pay secrecy clauses, shifting the burden of proof for pay discrimination to employers, expanding available damages, and increasing enforcement tools.
Who it helps: Employers who benefit from pay secrecy norms and asymmetric wage information; companies with the widest documented gender pay gaps including finance and technology; employers who use non-disclosure clauses to suppress pay equity claims. Impact: Women earn 82 cents per dollar earned by men — would have strengthened equal pay enforcement for 63M women in workforce
Who it hurts: 63 million women in the U.S. workforce subject to the gender pay gap; women in industries with strong pay secrecy norms including finance, technology, and professional services.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — April 15, 2021
✓ Yes: 217✗ No: 210
Senate cloture vote — June 8, 2021
✓ Yes: 49✗ No: 50
Senate cloture failed to reach the 60-vote threshold; bill did not receive a Senate floor vote.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Disapproving EEOC Conciliation Rule S.J.Res. 13
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A Congressional Review Act resolution (S.J.Res.13, 117th Congress) overturning an EEOC rule ('Update of Commission''s Conciliation Procedures', published Jan 14 2021) that protected confidentiality of the EEOC's pre-litigation settlement process for workplace discrimination complaints. Disapproving it removed those confidentiality protections. Signed into law as Public Law 117-22, June 30 2021.
Who it helps: Corporate defendants in discrimination cases who regained early access to EEOC investigative files; employment defense law firms; large employers facing high-volume EEOC charges. Impact: Repealed EEOC ability to resolve 70K+ annual discrimination charges through confidential conciliation without exposing investigative files to employers
Who it hurts: Workers with workplace discrimination complaints -- the 70,000+ annual EEOC charge filers -- who lost confidential conciliation protections, exposing their evidence to employers during settlement.
Sources
Congress.gov S.J.Res.13/117th Congress; Public Law 117-22 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/13)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Raise the Wage Act 116th H.R. 582
Bill impact
What it does: A 2019 House-passed bill to gradually raise the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 per hour by 2025, with automatic inflation adjustments thereafter, and to phase out the separate tipped minimum wage.
Who it helps: Employers paying the $7.25/hour federal minimum, particularly restaurant groups, fast-food chains (McDonald's, Yum! Brands), and large retailers employing the highest concentrations of minimum-wage workers. Impact: Passed House 231-199 on July 18 2019 -- first House passage of a minimum wage bill; died in Senate without a vote
Who it hurts: Low-wage workers, tipped workers, workers with disabilities.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Flexibility for Workers Education Act H.R. 2262
Bill impact
What it does: A bill making the tax exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance permanent and expanding it to cover a broader range of qualifying education expenses paid by employers on behalf of employees.
Who it helps: Employers who can require unpaid mandatory training sessions; companies with high regulatory compliance training requirements; staffing agencies that mandate unpaid orientation sessions.
Who it hurts: 140 million private-sector workers covered by FLSA who could be required to attend mandatory unpaid training sessions under the bill's exclusion from overtime calculation. Impact: Allows employers to require unpaid mandatory training sessions, affecting 140M private-sector workers covered by FLSA
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$37.3M
International Franchise Association$390K
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers$157K
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (Sbe Council)$30K
1Huddle Incamount undisclosed
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Employer Child and Elder Care Act H.R. 2270
Bill impact
What it does: A bill expanding federal tax credits for employers who provide or subsidize on-site or near-site child care and elder care benefits for their employees.
Who it helps: Employers who offer childcare benefits while reducing effective overtime obligations; large corporations with formal childcare programs who benefit from lower overtime liability calculations.
Who it hurts: 4 million working parents whose employer-provided childcare benefits are excluded from overtime calculations, effectively reducing their overtime pay rate. Impact: Excludes employer childcare from overtime calculation, reducing effective overtime pay for 4M working parents
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$37.3M
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (Sbe Council)$30K
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Restricting ESG in Retirement Plans Act H.R. 5339
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to codify restrictions on the use of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria in managing ERISA retirement plans, requiring investment decisions to be based solely on financial return.
Who it helps: Traditional financial products companies regaining competitive ground; oil, gas, and coal companies whose stocks are underweighted in ESG screens; ideological opponents of ESG investing who sought to codify the restriction.
Who it hurts: 150 million retirement savers with ERISA-covered accounts barred from choosing ESG investment options; workers who prefer retirement savings aligned with their values or who want climate risk factored into holdings. Impact: Bans 150M retirement savers from ESG funds; limits investment diversification across $12T in 401k assets
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act H.R. 7309
Bill impact
What it does: A reauthorization of the primary federal workforce development law, funding job training programs, one-stop career centers, vocational rehabilitation services, and adult education through formula grants to states.
Who it helps: States that prefer block grant flexibility over targeted federal workforce program requirements; private job training companies that compete with federally funded programs. Impact: WIOA serves 700K job seekers annually with training and placement; 2022 update added clean energy and tech pathways
Who it hurts: 700,000 job seekers annually receiving federally funded training and placement; displaced workers in manufacturing and coal communities; adults seeking basic education and GED completion; workers with disabilities in vocational rehabilitation.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Rights for the TSA Workforce Act H.R. 903
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to extend full collective bargaining rights, civil service protections, and employment appeal rights to Transportation Security Administration officers, who are currently excluded from standard federal labor law.
Who it helps: TSA management and DHS retaining unilateral control over workforce decisions without union negotiation; airport operators who prefer management flexibility in staffing. Impact: 62K TSA officers were the only federal workforce without civil service protections or collective bargaining rights; average pay $45K/year
Who it hurts: 62,000 TSA officers — the only federal workforce without civil service appeal rights or collective bargaining — earning an average of $45,000/year with no protection against arbitrary termination.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Susan Muffley Act (Pension Guarantees) H.R. 6929
Bill impact
What it does: A law providing federal guarantees through the PBGC for retirees in certain insolvent multiemployer pension plans, restoring full pension benefits to participants whose plans had become unable to pay promised benefits.
Who it helps: PBGC, which faced smaller obligations under the previous lower guarantee thresholds; employers in solvent plans who avoid potential cross-subsidy assessments; fiscal conservatives opposing expanded federal pension guarantees. Impact: Protected 1.5M multiemployer pension beneficiaries from losing up to 65% of earned benefits by guaranteeing PBGC coverage
Who it hurts: 1.5 million multiemployer pension beneficiaries in insolvent plans who were at risk of losing up to 65% of earned benefits; workers in trucking, construction, retail, and other industries with multi-employer plans.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act H.R. 3110
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 law extending break time and lactation space requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act to salaried and other workers previously excluded from nursing accommodation protections.
Who it helps: Employers who previously had no obligation to provide nursing breaks or private spaces for salaried workers; industries with high concentrations of salaried female employees including education and healthcare management. Impact: Extended nursing break requirements to 9M salaried employees previously excluded from federal lactation protections
Who it hurts: 9 million salaried and previously FLSA-exempt employees — teachers, office workers, nurses — who gained access to break time and private spaces for nursing; working mothers in white-collar industries.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Protecting Older Workers Act H.R. 2062
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to restore the but-for causation standard in age discrimination cases, reversing a Supreme Court decision that had made it significantly harder for older workers to prove they were fired because of their age.
Who it helps: Employers who benefit from the easier mixed-motive defense standard in age discrimination cases; large corporations with documented patterns of early retirement pressure and older worker layoffs. Impact: Restored age discrimination protections for 41M workers 40+ reversed by a 2009 Supreme Court ruling
Who it hurts: 41 million workers over age 40 who regain the stronger but-for causation standard in age discrimination cases; workers in industries with documented age discrimination including technology, finance, and manufacturing.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Workplace Violence Prevention Act H.R. 1195
Bill impact
What it does: A bill directing OSHA to develop and enforce a mandatory workplace violence prevention standard for healthcare and social assistance industries, where workers face disproportionately high rates of on-the-job violence.
Who it helps: Hospital systems, nursing home operators, and home health agencies that would face new OSHA compliance costs; hospital trade associations that lobbied against mandatory workplace violence prevention standards. Impact: Healthcare workers face 5x the workplace violence rate of other sectors; 76% of hospital workers report being assaulted on the job annually
Who it hurts: Over 2 million healthcare workers who experience workplace violence annually — nurses, EMTs, social workers, mental health workers; emergency department and psychiatric unit workers with the highest assault rates.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+National Apprenticeship Act 2021 H.R. 447
Bill impact
What it does: The 117th Congress version of legislation to modernize registered apprenticeship programs, invest in industry-recognized credentials, expand access for underrepresented groups, and fund pre-apprenticeship training.
Who it helps: For-profit education providers competing with federally funded pathways; employers who prefer unregulated apprenticeship-like programs without federal wage or curriculum standards. Impact: Would have invested $3.5B to create 2M apprenticeship slots in nursing, clean energy, and technology sectors
Who it hurts: Workers displaced from declining industries seeking retraining; 2 million projected new apprentices in clean energy, nursing, and technology sectors; underrepresented groups in high-wage trades.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+National Apprenticeship Act 2020 H.R. 8294
Bill impact
What it does: A 2020 House-passed bill to expand federally registered apprenticeship programs, increase diversity and inclusion in apprenticeships, and invest in pre-apprenticeship pathways for underrepresented workers.
Who it helps: For-profit colleges and trade schools that compete with free registered apprenticeship pathways; employers who prefer informal training arrangements without the wage standards required by registered apprenticeships. Impact: Would have expanded registered apprenticeships — average starting wage $70,000/year — to serve 1M workers by 2025
Who it hurts: Workers seeking pathways into skilled trades averaging $70,000/year starting wages; women and minority workers historically underrepresented in registered apprenticeships; young workers seeking alternatives to four-year college.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Pregnant Workers Fairness Act 2020 H.R. 2694
Bill impact
What it does: The 116th Congress version of legislation requiring employers to provide pregnancy-related workplace accommodations and expanding antidiscrimination protections for pregnant and postpartum workers.
Who it helps: Employers who could deny pregnancy accommodations; industries preferring not to modify job duties or schedules for pregnant workers. Impact: 2M pregnant workers lacked basic accommodations annually before this law; 5M pregnancies occur in the U.S. workforce each year
Who it hurts: 2 million pregnant workers annually who faced discrimination or were forced out of jobs; workers in physically demanding industries including retail, healthcare, construction, and food service.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+PRO Act (117th) H.R. 842
Bill impact
What it does: The 117th Congress version of the PRO Act to expand workers' union organizing rights, override state right-to-work laws, protect gig workers, and increase fines for employers who violate labor law.
Who it helps: Private sector workers seeking to unionize; gig workers reclassified as employees, gaining collective bargaining power. Impact: Passed House 225-206 on March 9, 2021. Union workers earn a median wage premium of 15% over non-union counterparts; bill would have extended those protections to millions more workers
Who it hurts: Corporations and franchise operators facing new union-contract obligations; gig economy platforms (Uber, Lyft, DoorDash) that would have to reclassify workers as employees; union-avoidance consulting firms.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+PRO Act (116th) H.R. 2474
Bill impact
What it does: The 116th Congress version of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, which would have strengthened collective bargaining rights, overridden state right-to-work laws, and increased penalties for employer interference in union organizing.
Who it helps: Private sector workers seeking to unionize; gig workers, gaining collective bargaining power. Impact: Passed House 224-194 in Feb 2020 — first House passage of major pro-union legislation in decades; died in Senate, same as 2021 version
Who it hurts: Corporations and franchise operators facing new union-contract obligations; industries with the highest rates of union avoidance including retail, food service, and logistics; law firms specializing in union avoidance consulting.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Pregnant Workers Fairness Act H.R. 1065
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 law requiring employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions, modeled on and complementary to ADA disability accommodation requirements.
Who it helps: Employers who could previously legally deny pregnancy accommodations without ADA-equivalent obligation; industries with physically demanding work including retail, construction, food service, and warehousing. Impact: Passed House 315-101 on May 14, 2021. Passed Senate as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, 68-29 on December 22, 2022. House agreed to Senate amendment 215-201 on December 23, 2022. Signed into law December 29, 2022. Signed into law Dec 2022; requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy — EEOC received 2,200+ charges in first year showing high demand for protections
Who it hurts: Pregnant workers and workers with postpartum conditions across all industries.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Kids Online Safety Act S. 1409
Bill impact
What it does: A 2024 bill requiring social media and online platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent harm to minors, including limiting algorithmic recommendations, providing parental controls, and restricting addictive design features.
Who it helps: Minors and their families using social media and online platforms — the bill's protective intent.
Who it hurts: Meta, TikTok, YouTube, and Snapchat, which would face design-mandate compliance costs; advertising technology companies relying on engagement-maximizing algorithms targeting minors.
Key stat: 54M+ children and teens under 18 in the US; roughly 95% of teens report using social media, per Senate committee testimony cited in coverage of the bill.
Sources
NBC News / Wikipedia / Alston Privacy (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-poised-pass-significant-child-online-safety-bills-decades-rcna164259)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Senate vote — July 30, 2024
✓ Yes: 91✗ No: 3
This vote was cast on S.2073, the combined "Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act" package (merging KOSA with COPPA 2.0) -- not on S.1409 itself, which never received its own floor vote.
The House passed a non-identical version the same day; the two chambers never reconciled the differences, and the combined package died when the 118th Congress adjourned without a unified bill reaching the President.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+CHIPS and Science Act H.R. 4346
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Authorizes roughly $52.7 billion in federal subsidies for domestic semiconductor manufacturing and research (including NSF and DOE Office of Science funding), plus a 25% investment tax credit for chip fabrication facilities.
Who it helps: Domestic semiconductor manufacturers (Intel, TSMC Arizona, Samsung Texas, Micron, and others) receiving subsidies; U.S. supply-chain resilience against Taiwan/China dependency.
Who it hurts: Federal deficit impact from the ~$52.7B subsidy package; companies with substantial China business ties, which face a 10-year bar on expanding advanced semiconductor manufacturing in China as a condition of receiving funds.
Key stat: $52.7 billion in semiconductor manufacturing subsidies and R&D funding, plus a 25% investment tax credit for chip fabrication facilities; recipients are barred from expanding advanced semiconductor manufacturing in China for 10 years.
Signed into law August 9, 2022, as Public Law 117-167.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+State and Local Government Cybersecurity Act of 2021 S. 2520
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Directs the Department of Homeland Security and CISA to increase cybersecurity collaboration, threat-intelligence sharing, and technical assistance with state, local, tribal, and territorial governments.
Who it helps: State and local governments gaining federal cybersecurity resources and threat-intelligence sharing. Impact: Directs DHS/CISA to expand cybersecurity collaboration, threat-intelligence sharing, and technical assistance specifically for state, local, tribal, and territorial governments, which are frequent ransomware targets with limited in-house cybersecurity budgets.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- a federal coordination/technical-assistance mandate, not a bill with an identifiable losing side.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · CBO · National Special Districts Association (https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2520)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — May 17, 2022
✓ Yes: 276✗ No: 10
Senate passed by unanimous consent on January 11, 2022 -- no roll call recorded.
Signed into law June 21, 2022, as Public Law 117-150.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Building Chips in America Act of 2023 S. 2228
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Exempts certain projects funded under the CHIPS and Science Act from full environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act, streamlining permitting for semiconductor fabrication facility construction.
Who it helps: Semiconductor manufacturers building CHIPS-Act-funded fabs, via faster permitting.
Who it hurts: Environmental review scrutiny for CHIPS Act-funded semiconductor manufacturing projects, which is reduced for these specific projects.
Key stat: Exempts CHIPS Act-funded semiconductor manufacturing projects from full National Environmental Policy Act review, aiming to shorten fab-construction permitting timelines that industry groups said were slowing CHIPS Act implementation.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · Semiconductor Industry Association · EPW Committee (https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/2228)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — September 23, 2024
✓ Yes: 221✗ No: 114
Senate passed by unanimous consent on December 14, 2023 -- no roll call recorded.
Signed into law October 2, 2024.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Expediting Federal Broadband Deployment Reviews Act H.R. 1681
Bill impact
What it does: Establishes an interagency strike force -- including NTIA and federal land management agencies -- to speed review of communications-use authorizations needed to build or modify broadband infrastructure on federal land.
Who it helps: Telecommunications and broadband providers seeking faster permitting on federal land; rural and underserved communities awaiting broadband buildout. Impact: CBO estimated the bill would cost about $9 million over the 2025-2030 period to establish and administer the interagency strike force and its reporting requirements.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- a permitting-coordination bill, not a bill with an identifiable losing side.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Strengthening Cyber Resilience Against State-Sponsored Threats Act H.R. 2659
Bill impact
What it does: Establishes a DHS/CISA-led interagency task force to detect, analyze, and respond to cybersecurity threats to U.S. critical infrastructure from People's Republic of China state-sponsored actors.
Who it helps: U.S. critical infrastructure operators and national security broadly, via coordinated threat detection and response. Impact: Specifically targets Volt Typhoon, a People's Republic of China state-sponsored hacking group that has compromised U.S. critical infrastructure networks; the task force's first report is due within 540 days of establishment.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- a national-security coordination mandate, not a bill with an identifiable losing side.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · House Report 119-230 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/2659)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — November 17, 2025
✓ Yes: 396✗ No: 8
House passed; the Senate has not yet voted.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Protecting Semiconductor Supply Chain Materials from Authoritarians Act H.R. 7372
Bill impact
What it does: Would require the President to establish a State Department-chaired interagency working group addressing semiconductor supply-chain disruptions caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, reporting to Congress on steps taken to bolster the supply chain.
Who it helps: U.S. semiconductor manufacturers facing raw-material supply disruptions from the war. Impact: Targets semiconductor supply-chain disruption specifically caused by Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine -- both countries are major sources of raw materials like neon gas and palladium used in chip manufacturing.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- a supply-chain coordination/reporting mandate, not a bill with an identifiable losing side.
House passed; the Senate never held a floor vote before the 117th Congress adjourned.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+AI for Main Street Act H.R. 5764
Bill impact
What it does: Amends the Small Business Act to direct Small Business Development Centers to help small businesses evaluate and adopt artificial intelligence tools, through training, best practices, and outreach.
Who it helps: Small businesses gaining free AI-adoption guidance and training through SBDCs. Impact: Directs SBA Small Business Development Centers to provide small businesses with AI evaluation and adoption guidance, including best practices and planning for unexpected circumstances.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- a technical-assistance mandate, not a bill with an identifiable losing side.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · House Report 119-403 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/5764)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$18.0M
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (Sbe Council)$30K
How Congress voted
House vote — January 20, 2026
✓ Yes: 393✗ No: 14
House passed; the Senate has not yet voted.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+DISCLOSE Act of 2022 S. 4822
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to require additional disclosure of political spending by corporations, unions, and other organizations, closing loopholes that allow anonymous ('dark money') spending on federal elections.
Who it helps:Not yet assessed.
Who it hurts:Not yet assessed.
Sources
Internal votes table (bill_id=46911, roll_call_id=2022-Senate-00346), cross-checked against bills.status text for the official 49-49 tally. (https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4822)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Cloture on the motion to proceed failed in the Senate, 49-49, September 12, 2022 (Record Vote #346) — short of the 60 votes needed to end debate; the bill never received an up-or-down vote on its merits. Note: the DB's own votes table only captures 76 of the ~98 senators recorded that day (35 Yes / 39 No / 2 Not Voting) — a systemic gap affecting every 2022 Senate roll call in this database, not specific to this bill. Traced to two causes: most of the shortfall is senators who've since left office and have no row in the current-roster-only politicians table (a structural limit, not a bug); a smaller number, including Sens. Cortez Masto and Van Hollen — both still serving today — show a genuine, still-unexplained gap in this bill's specific 2022 vote coverage (fragments of their 2022 votes exist under a differently-formatted roll_call_id elsewhere in the table, suggesting a separate, narrower ingestion issue). The 49-49 figure from bills.status is treated as authoritative here; the votes table's 35-39-2 breakdown is not.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Tribal Trust Land Homeownership Act of 2025 S. 723
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: Sets binding deadlines for the Bureau of Indian Affairs to process residential and business leasehold mortgages on tribal trust and restricted Indian land -- notification on receipt, preliminary review within 10 days, and approval/disapproval within 20-30 days depending on application type, plus notice requirements for delays and title status reports.
Who it helps: Native American homebuyers and lenders on tribal trust land, who've historically faced long, unpredictable BIA processing delays that made mortgage lending on trust land difficult to obtain. Impact: Sets binding BIA deadlines for the first time: notification on receipt of documentation, preliminary review within 10 days, and approval/disapproval within 20-30 days depending on application type, plus notice requirements for delays and title status reports.
Who it hurts: No clear opposing beneficiary identified -- a process-deadline mandate on the Bureau of Indian Affairs, not a bill with an identifiable losing side.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · CBO · White House (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/723)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Consumer Technology Association$1.1M
Boehringer Ingelheim Usa Corporation$850K
Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy$310K
Digital Therapeutics Alliance, Inc$31K
Bluebird Strategies$10K
Digital Therapeutics Alliance, Incorporatedamount undisclosed
Digital Therapeutics Allianceamount undisclosed
How Congress voted
House vote — March 4, 2026
✓ Yes: 384✗ No: 40
Senate passed by unanimous consent on December 11, 2025 -- no roll call recorded.
Signed into law May 4, 2026, as Public Law 119-88.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Housing our Military Veterans Effectively Act of 2023 H.R. 3848
Bill impact
What it does: Increases VA per diem payments to organizations providing services and transitional housing to homeless veterans, up to 200% of the standard rate for providers in rural, high-suicide-rate, or high-homelessness areas. Authorizes VA to give HUD-VASH participants and homeless veterans essential items (food, shelter, clothing, transportation, communication equipment). Also extends current VA home loan funding-fee rates through May 2032.
Who it helps: Homeless veterans and HUD-VASH program participants, via expanded funding and essential-item support; veteran-homelessness service providers in underserved areas.
Who it hurts: Veterans taking out new VA-backed home loans, who face an extended funding-fee rate adding roughly $5/month to mortgage costs through 2032.
Key stat: Authorizes per diem payments up to 200% of the standard rate for homeless-veteran service providers in rural, high-suicide-rate, or high-homelessness areas.
Sources
Congress.gov · GovTrack · CBO · House Report 118-189 (https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/3848)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
House vote — December 5, 2023
✓ Yes: 408✗ No: 10
House passed; the Senate never held a floor vote before the 118th Congress adjourned.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Emergency Housing Protections and Relief Act of 2020 H.R. 7301
Bill impact
What it does: COVID-era bill extending federal eviction moratorium protections, establishing an emergency homeowner and rental assistance fund, and providing funding for federal housing assistance programs (Section 8, public housing) strained by the pandemic.
Who it helps: Renters and homeowners facing COVID-related eviction/foreclosure risk; recipients of federal rental/homeowner assistance.
Who it hurts: Landlord groups, who opposed extending the eviction moratorium on cash-flow grounds; no direct financial mechanism in the bill itself targets a specific losing party beyond that opposition.
Key stat: Introduced amid the COVID-19 pandemic to extend federal eviction-moratorium protections, establish an emergency homeowner and rental assistance fund, and shore up federal housing assistance programs (Section 8, public housing) strained by pandemic job losses.
House Roll Call 128 is the final-passage vote -- the DB's raw capture (two roll calls, ~245 voters each, opposite outcomes) didn't match this live-verified tally and wasn't used. The Senate never held a floor vote before the 116th Congress adjourned.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Women's Health Protection Act 2021 H.R. 3755
Failed
Bill impact
What it does: A 2021 Senate bill to codify the right to abortion access under federal law and invalidate state restrictions that went beyond what the Supreme Court had permitted under Roe v. Wade.
Who it helps: State governments that enacted abortion restrictions; anti-abortion advocacy organizations and their political funders; politicians in states with restrictive laws who use the issue for electoral mobilization. Impact: Voted in Senate February 28, 2022 — before Dobbs ruling; blocked 46-48; would have preemptively protected abortion access by overriding state restrictions under Roe
Who it hurts: Women of reproductive age in states with abortion restrictions, particularly in the South and Midwest; 41 million women in states with bans or near-total restrictions; low-income women without travel funds.
House passed a related measure in September 2021; this Senate cloture vote on the motion to proceed is the decisive Senate action -- it failed to reach the 60-vote threshold.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Maternal Stillbirth Prevention Act H.R. 4581
Enacted
Bill impact
What it does: A bill directing the NIH and CDC to increase research funding, standardize data collection, and expand public awareness and clinical education efforts focused on the prevention of stillbirth.
Who it helps: States and health systems that prefer no federal mandate on stillbirth data reporting. Impact: 27,000 stillbirths occur annually in the U.S. — one of the highest rates among wealthy nations; expanded research and prevention for 3.6M annual births
Who it hurts: Pregnant people at risk of stillbirth — Black women at 2x the rate of white women; the 27,000 families who experience stillbirth annually; 3.6 million births occurring each year without standardized preventive screening.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
Vote data not yet curated for this bill
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Women's Health Protection Act 2022 H.R. 8296
Bill impact
What it does: A Senate bill brought to a floor vote following the Dobbs decision to establish a federal statutory right to abortion and override state-level abortion bans and restrictions.
Who it helps: States that enacted abortion bans post-Dobbs; religious and anti-abortion political organizations; politicians in states whose constituents support abortion restrictions. Impact: Voted in Senate July 2022 following Dobbs ruling; blocked 49-51; would have restored federal abortion access for 41M women in states with post-Dobbs bans
Who it hurts: 41 million women of reproductive age in states with abortion bans or near-total restrictions enacted after the Dobbs decision; low-income women unable to access care in neighboring states.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Ensuring Reproductive Freedom Act H.R. 8297
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to codify the right to abortion under federal statutory law, preventing states from enacting bans or restrictions that would conflict with the protections formerly established by Roe v. Wade.
Who it helps: State governments that enacted post-Dobbs travel bans; anti-abortion advocacy organizations; politicians in states with restrictive laws who use abortion restrictions for electoral mobilization. Impact: Protected right to travel for abortion care for 24M women of reproductive age in states with bans
Who it hurts: 24 million women of reproductive age in states with abortion bans or restrictions; women in states that enacted travel bans; low-income women without resources to cross state lines for care.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Right to Contraception Act (House) H.R. 8373
Bill impact
What it does: The House version of legislation establishing a statutory right to contraception and preventing any government restriction on the use or provision of contraceptive methods and information.
Who it helps: States and politicians seeking to restrict contraceptive access; pharmacies and employers seeking religious exemptions from contraception coverage mandates. Impact: Would have protected contraception access for 72M women of reproductive age after Supreme Court ended Roe
Who it hurts: 72 million women of reproductive age who use contraception, particularly in states where legislative restrictions on contraceptive access have been proposed or enacted.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Act H.R. 21
Bill impact
What it does: A bill requiring medical providers to deliver the same standard of care to any infant born alive after a failed abortion as would be provided to any other newborn of the same gestational age.
Who it helps: Anti-abortion advocacy organizations using the bill for political messaging; Republican politicians using the bill for electoral signaling; pro-life legal organizations building a legislative record for incremental abortion restrictions.
Who it hurts: Physicians and medical facilities facing new federal felony liability for standard clinical judgment in fewer than 50 documented annual cases; patients and families dealing with complex late-term medical situations. Impact: Imposes felony charges on physicians in fewer than 50 documented annual cases; leading medical organizations say existing law already covers these situations
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
American Medical Association$8.0M
American Academy of Family Physicians$3.8M
Susan B Anthony List$1.1M
American Psychiatric Association$822K
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists$660K
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights$530K
American Academy of Pediatrics$380K
Independent Petroleum Association of America$110K
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc$109K
Center for Reproductive Rights$90K
National Taxpayers Union$60K
Hadassah, the Women's Zionist Organization of America, INC.$60K
American Public Health Association$59K
Reproductive Freedom for All$50K
Alliance Defending Freedom$40K
American Society of Hematology$30K
Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee$13K
Guttmacher Institute$10K
Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc$10K
Students for Life Actionamount undisclosed
60 Plus Associationamount undisclosed
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Preventing Maternal Deaths Act H.R. 3838
Bill impact
What it does: A law authorizing federal funding for state maternal mortality review committees to investigate pregnancy-related deaths, identify preventable causes, and develop evidence-based clinical and policy recommendations.
Who it helps: States and health systems that prefer no federal oversight of maternal mortality outcomes; entities resistant to standardized reporting and review committee requirements. Impact: U.S. maternal mortality doubled since 2000 to 32.9 per 100K births — highest among wealthy nations; Black women die at 3x the rate of white women
Who it hurts: Pregnant people and postpartum mothers at risk of preventable death — Black women die at 3x the rate of white women; families affected by the U.S. maternal mortality rate of 32.9 per 100,000, highest among wealthy nations.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Jackie Walorski Maternal Home Visiting H.R. 8876
Bill impact
What it does: A reauthorization and expansion of the federal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program, which funds nurse and social worker home visits for at-risk families with young children.
Who it helps: States that prefer block grant flexibility over targeted home visiting mandates; fiscal conservatives preferring reduced program funding. Impact: Home visiting programs serve 160K low-income families annually; shown to reduce infant mortality 20% and child abuse 50%
Who it hurts: 160,000 at-risk families with young children served annually by MIECHV programs; low-income first-time mothers; rural families for whom home visiting is the only accessible family support service.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Pregnant Women in Custody Act H.R. 6878
Bill impact
What it does: A bill restricting the use of physical restraints on pregnant women in federal custody during labor, delivery, and the postpartum period, and guaranteeing access to prenatal medical care.
Who it helps: Corrections facilities that resist new care mandates; private prison companies (CoreCivic, GEO Group) that oppose additional compliance requirements; states that oppose federal standards for incarcerated populations. Impact: 58K pregnant women incarcerated annually; shackling during labor and delivery remains legal in 22 states despite documented medical harm
Who it hurts: 58,000 pregnant women incarcerated annually; women in the 22 states where shackling during labor and delivery remains legal; women in federal custody facing prenatal care gaps.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Pregnant Students' Rights Act H.R. 6359
Bill impact
What it does: A bill requiring colleges and universities to notify pregnant students of their legal rights and available support services, and prohibiting institutions from pressuring students to withdraw or take leave due to pregnancy.
Who it helps: Colleges and universities that can avoid formal accommodation processes; institutions that benefit from pregnant students withdrawing rather than requiring leaves of absence. Impact: Passed House 222-206 in 2022 (117th Congress); Senate did not take it up before session ended — would have required colleges to notify students of Title IX pregnancy accommodation rights
Who it hurts: 1.2 million student-parents at U.S. colleges and universities; the 1 in 5 pregnant students who drop out — often unaware of their Title IX accommodation rights.
National Assn of Independent Colleges & Universities$85K
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Pregnant Students' Rights Act 2024 H.R. 6914
Bill impact
What it does: The 2024 version of legislation requiring higher education institutions to provide reasonable accommodations, support services, and accurate information to pregnant and parenting students.
Who it helps: Colleges that prefer discretion over mandatory accommodation structures; athletic programs that resist accommodating pregnant student athletes. Impact: Passed House 383-0 in January 2024 (118th Congress) with broad bipartisan support; Senate failed to act before session ended — same core protections as the 2022 version, stronger bipartisan backing
Who it hurts: 1.2 million student-parents at higher education institutions; pregnant and parenting students in programs that have not implemented Title IX pregnancy protections; student athletes.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Women's Health Protection Act S. 4132
Bill impact
What it does: The 118th Congress version of legislation establishing a federal statutory right to abortion services and preempting state laws that impose medically unnecessary restrictions on abortion providers or patients.
Who it helps: States that enacted post-Dobbs abortion bans; anti-abortion advocacy organizations; religious institutions and political organizations opposing abortion access. Impact: Would have restored federal right to abortion for ~40M women in states with bans; economic research shows abortion access directly affects women's earnings and poverty rates
Who it hurts: Women of reproductive age, particularly low-income women without access to travel funds.
Sources
KFF / Guttmacher Institute (https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/the-toll-of-abortion-bans/)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Right to Contraception Act S. 4381
Bill impact
What it does: A bill establishing a federal statutory right to access contraceptive methods, information, and services, and prohibiting federal or state laws that would restrict or interfere with that access.
Who it helps: States that have proposed or enacted contraception restrictions; pharmacies and employers seeking religious exemptions from contraceptive coverage; politicians representing constituencies with strict views on contraception. Impact: Blocked by Senate filibuster 51-39; would have guaranteed nationwide right to contraception — only Collins and Murkowski among GOP voted yes
Who it hurts: Women of reproductive age using contraception.
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Right to IVF Act S. 4445
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to establish a federal statutory right to access in vitro fertilization and other assisted reproductive technologies, preventing restrictions on IVF at the state or federal level.
Who it helps: States that have treated frozen embryos as children under wrongful death statutes; anti-IVF advocacy groups; politicians who support fetal personhood laws that may restrict IVF. Impact: Blocked twice in Senate (51-44 both times); would have established federal right to IVF after Alabama Supreme Court ruled frozen embryos are children
Who it hurts: Couples and individuals seeking IVF treatment, particularly in states with restrictive embryo laws.
Sources
KFF / NBC News / Senator Duckworth (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/republicans-block-another-vote-ivf-protections-harris-makes-2024-issue-rcna171463)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+SAVE America Act S. 1383
Passed
Bill impact
What it does: S.1383 began as the bipartisan Veterans Accessibility Advisory Committee Act, passed unanimously by the Senate. Before the House floor vote, Republicans struck the entire text and substituted the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act -- requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote and photo ID to vote in federal elections. The House passed this substituted text 218-213 on a near party-line vote, Feb 11 2026. The bill, now an election-law rewrite rather than a veterans bill, awaits Senate action on the House amendment.
Who it helps: Proponents of stricter voter-eligibility verification; the bill does not address the original veterans-accessibility purpose it was introduced under.
Who it hurts: Eligible voters who lack ready access to passports or birth certificates -- disproportionately low-income, elderly, and minority voters -- who would be unable to register or vote without the required documentation. Impact: House gutted the bipartisan, Senate-passed veterans accessibility bill (S.1383) via a shell-bill maneuver and replaced it entirely with proof-of-citizenship and photo-ID voting requirements
Sources
Congress.gov S.1383/119th Congress; clerk.house.gov roll 069 (2026-02-11) (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1383)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
National Shooting Sports Foundation$1.6M
Military Officers Association of America$865K
Paralyzed Veterans of America$352K
National Association for Gun Rights$315K
Wounded Warrior Project$280K
Blinded Veterans Association$30K
How Congress voted
House vote — February 11, 2026
✓ Yes: 218✗ No: 213
Senate has not yet voted on the House-amended bill.
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+SAVE Act H.R. 22
Bill impact
What it does: A bill requiring individuals to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections, beyond the existing sworn attestation of citizenship on voter registration forms.
Who it helps: Politicians in states with lower voter registration rates who benefit from reduced turnout among groups less likely to have documentation readily available; organizations that support strict citizenship verification requirements.
Who it hurts: 21 million eligible U.S. citizen voters who lack a readily accessible passport or certified birth certificate, disproportionately elderly, low-income, minority, and rural voters; naturalized citizens facing higher documentary burdens. Impact: Passed House 220-208 in April 2025 (119th Congress) and signed into law; documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement projected to affect 21M eligible voters who lack passports or certified birth certificates
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
American Civil Liberties Union$2.2M
Gun Owners of America Inc$1.9M
Afl-cio$1.8M
American Federation of Teachers$1.3M
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights$1.2M
Communications Workers of America$942K
National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare$790K
League of Conservation Voters$740K
National Education Association$650K
Human Rights Campaign$614K
United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy$520K
League of Women Voters of the U.s.$323K
United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers$250K
Southern Poverty Law Center$150K
Federation for American Immigration Reform$139K
Independent Petroleum Association of America$110K
Votevets Action Fund, INC.$100K
Int'l Association of Bridge Structural Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers$100K
Ceres, INC.$100K
Ywca Usa$99K
Reproductive Freedom for All$90K
Southern Policy Law Center, INC.$80K
Moveon.org Civic Action$80K
Defend the Vote Action Fund$80K
Amac Action, INC.$80K
Protect Democracy United (Formerly Known As United to Protect Democracy)$70K
Arc of the United States$70K
Voter Participation Center$60K
Sempra Energy$50K
Transparency International U.s. (a Project of the Fund for Constitutional Govt)$30K
Democracy 21$30K
Conference of Provincials of North America$20K
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (Nacdl)$15K
Campaign Legal Center, INC.$10K
Act for America$10K
Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc$10K
Nextgen Climate Actionamount undisclosed
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+SAVE Act 2024 H.R. 8281
Bill impact
What it does: The 2024 version of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, requiring documentary proof of citizenship for federal voter registration, addressing concerns about non-citizen voter registration.
Who it helps: Politicians and political parties who benefit from lower voter registration among groups less likely to have documentation — disproportionately elderly, low-income, and minority voters.
Who it hurts: 21 million eligible U.S. citizen voters who lack documentary proof of citizenship, disproportionately elderly, low-income, minority, and rural voters; new registrants who must locate and present official identity documents. Impact: Passed House 221-198 on July 10, 2024. Senate never held a floor vote. 118th Congress version (H.R. 8281); passed House but failed to advance in Senate before session ended — same documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement later enacted via H.R. 22 in 2025
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+For the People Act H.R. 1
Bill impact
What it does: A sweeping 2021 democracy reform bill to expand voter registration and access, limit partisan gerrymandering, overhaul campaign finance disclosure, and establish a public financing system for congressional elections.
Who it helps: Incumbents protected by current partisan gerrymanders; dark money donors maintaining anonymity under current campaign finance rules; politicians who benefit from lower voter registration rates in their states. Impact: Passed House 220-210 on March 3, 2021. Would have automatically registered 50M eligible unregistered voters and banned partisan gerrymandering affecting 100M+
Who it hurts: 50 million eligible unregistered voters who would have been automatically registered; voters in states with restrictive ID laws; communities in gerrymandered districts across all 50 states; small-dollar political donors eligible for public matching.
Sources
Brennan Center for Justice (https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/policy-solutions/annotated-guide-people-act-2021)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Presidential Election Reform Act H.R. 8873
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 bill to clarify that the Vice President has no authority to reject or delay certification of Electoral College votes, codifying the procedures Congress follows when certifying presidential election results.
Who it helps: Politicians who preferred ambiguity in the Electoral Count Act to create procedural leverage; those who sought to exploit the Vice President's ceremonial certification role to challenge results. Impact: Reformed Electoral Count Act to prevent rejection of certified electoral votes; protects the votes of 160M Americans
Who it hurts: 160 million voters whose election results are protected from arbitrary procedural challenge; elected officials and election administrators who now have clearer certification procedures.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Equal Representation Act H.R. 7109
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to exclude non-citizens from the census population count used to apportion congressional seats and Electoral College votes among states after each decennial census.
Who it helps: Low-immigration states that gain relative representation; Republican-leaning states with smaller immigrant populations; politicians and parties who benefit from reapportionment shifting seats away from high-immigration states.
Who it hurts: High-immigration states (California, New York, Texas, New Jersey, Illinois) projected to lose 7–8 House seats; 11 million legal permanent residents excluded from apportionment; U.S.-citizen children of non-citizen parents whose states lose representation. Impact: Would remove 11M legal permanent residents from congressional apportionment, cutting 7-8 House seats from high-immigration states
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Vote by Mail Tracking Act H.R. 5658
Bill impact
What it does: A bill requiring states that allow mail-in voting to provide voters with a tracking system to monitor the status of their absentee ballots from submission through receipt, processing, and counting.
Who it helps: States that prefer less voter visibility into ballot processing; election officials in states with high mail ballot rejection rates; politicians who benefit from lower mail ballot completion rates. Impact: 33M Americans voted by mail in 2022; tracking would have reduced 560K rejected ballots annually lost due to uncertain receipt status
Who it hurts: 33 million Americans who voted by mail in 2022; 560,000 voters whose ballots are rejected annually, often due to arrival status uncertainty; voters with disabilities and those over 65 who disproportionately use mail voting.
Sources
No source loaded.
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
+Freedom to Vote John R. Lewis Act H.R. 5746
Bill impact
What it does: A 2022 combined bill pairing broad voting access expansion with a restored Voting Rights Act preclearance requirement for jurisdictions with a documented history of voting discrimination.
Who it helps: Incumbents protected by current partisan gerrymanders; politicians in states with voting restrictions who benefit from reduced minority voter turnout; dark money donors maintaining anonymity under current campaign finance rules. Impact: Blocked by Senate filibuster Jan 19, 2022; would have restored VRA preclearance, made Election Day a federal holiday, and expanded automatic voter registration
Who it hurts: All eligible voters, particularly Black voters, low-income voters, and voters in states with restrictive voting laws.
Sources
Brennan Center / CNN (https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/freedom-vote-john-r-lewis-act)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
How Congress voted
No floor vote in either chamber
How did your representative vote?
Donations from this politician's donors who also lobbied this bill
Donor cross-reference not yet available for this bill.
Bills that never got a vote, and legislation currently before Congress.
+AI State Regulation Moratorium H.R. 1 (provision)
No vote, either chamber
Bill impact
What it does: A provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 that would prohibit state and local governments from enforcing their own artificial intelligence regulations for a period of ten years.
Who it helps: Large technology companies (Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple) that benefit from preemption of 1,000+ state AI regulations; AI developers seeking to avoid state rules on algorithmic discrimination, deepfakes, and child safety.
Who it hurts: Workers, consumers, and minors protected by state AI laws covering deepfakes, discrimination, privacy, and child safety.
Sources
Reason / Time / Goodwin Law (https://reason.com/2025/07/01/senate-votes-99-1-to-remove-ai-moratorium-from-big-beautiful-bill/)
This is not a separately voted bill — it's a provision within H.R.1 — so no independent status or lobbying data applies.
+CFPB Medical Debt Rule Repeal S.J.Res. 36
No vote, either chamber
Bill impact
What it does: A Congressional Review Act resolution overturning a CFPB rule that would have removed most medical debt from consumer credit reports, affecting tens of millions of Americans with outstanding medical bills.
Who it helps: Major credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion) retaining medical debt as data; hospitals and debt buyers selling medical debt portfolios; financial institutions that use credit scores containing medical debt to justify higher interest rates.
Who it hurts: People with medical debt on credit reports, disproportionately middle-aged, Black, Latino, disabled, rural, and Southern households.
Sources
CFPB / CRS / Consumer Federation of America (https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12169)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$37.3M
Aarp$6.6M
Credit Union National Association, INC. dba America's Credit Unions$2.4M
Trans Union Llc$1.2M
Americans for Financial Reform$300K
Human Rights Campaign$181K
Americans for Tax Reform$180K
U.s. Public Interest Research Group$10K
Status
Introduced March 11, 2025 · Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
+$15 Minimum Wage Senate Amendment S.Amdt.891
No vote, either chamber
Bill impact
What it does: A 2021 Senate amendment to the American Rescue Plan that would have raised the federal minimum wage to $15/hour by 2025; ruled out of order by the Senate parliamentarian under budget reconciliation rules.
Who it helps: Low-wage workers nationwide.
Who it hurts: Employers paying the $7.25/hour federal minimum, particularly restaurant chains paying the $2.13/hour tipped minimum; large retailers and fast-food operators (McDonald's, Walmart, Amazon) with the highest concentrations of minimum-wage workers.
Sources
EPI / Senate roll call (https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1171/vote_117_1_00074.htm)
This is not a separately voted bill — it's a Senate floor amendment — so no independent status or lobbying data applies.
+DISCLOSE Act of 2026 H.R. 7802
No vote, either chamber
Bill impact
What it does: The current (119th Congress) reintroduction of the DISCLOSE Act, requiring additional disclosure of political spending by corporations, unions, and other organizations to close 'dark money' loopholes in federal election spending. Companion bill: S.3991.
Who it helps / hurts:Data not available at this time.
Sources
Internal bills table (bill_id=7801, companion S.3991=bill_id=12677); status text. (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7802)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
Status
Introduced March 4, 2026 · Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
+Ban Corporate PACs Act H.R. 4799
No vote, either chamber
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to prohibit corporations from operating political action committees (PACs), eliminating a major channel of direct corporate campaign contributions to federal candidates. Companion bill: S.2515.
Who it helps / hurts:Data not available at this time.
Sources
Internal bills table (bill_id=4814, companion S.2515=bill_id=11177); status text. (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4799)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Arch Resources, INC. (Formerly Arch Coal, INC.)$150K
University of Nevada, Reno$40K
Status
Introduced July 29, 2025 · Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
+End Dark Money Act H.R. 2498
No vote, either chamber
Bill impact
What it does: A bill to require 501(c)(4) 'social welfare' organizations and similar tax-exempt groups to publicly disclose donors who fund political spending, targeting the 'dark money' loophole in campaign finance law.
Who it helps / hurts:Data not available at this time.
Sources
Internal bills table (bill_id=2511); status text. (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/2498)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
Status
Introduced March 31, 2025 · Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
+Constitutional Amendment on Campaign Finance H.J.Res. 119
No vote, either chamber
Bill impact
What it does: A proposed constitutional amendment authorizing Congress and the states to set limits on campaign contributions and spending, prohibit corporate spending in elections, and requiring Congress to establish a system of public financing for federal candidates who qualify for the ballot.
Who it helps / hurts:Data not available at this time.
Sources
Internal bills table (bill_id=15333). NOTE: this bill exists as two identical duplicate rows in the bills table (id=15333 and id=15378 — same title, status, and introduced date) — the same unresolved duplicate-row pattern flagged for S.J.Res.26 earlier tonight, not yet root-caused. bill_id=15333 used here; the duplicate carries no additional information. (https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/119)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
No lobbying records found for this bill.
Status
Introduced September 10, 2025 · Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
What it does: A 2025 bill strengthening the 1998 Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), extending its protections to mobile apps, broadening covered personal information to include biometric data, restricting targeted advertising to minors, and granting teens ages 13–16 independent rights to access and delete their own data.
Who it would help / hurt:Data not available at this time.
Sources
govinfo.gov, official bill text (BILLS-119hr6291ih) (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr6291ih/html/BILLS-119hr6291ih.htm)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$18.0M
Meta Platforms, INC. and Various Subsidiaries$6.5M
Google Client Services Llc$3.4M
American Association for Justice$1.9M
National Retail Federation$1.6M
Fox Corporation$1.5M
National Restaurant Association$830K
Food Marketplace Inc$800K
Uber Technologies, INC.$790K
Allstate Insurance Company$670K
American Civil Liberties Union$520K
News Media Alliance$480K
Ebay INC.$480K
National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies$466K
Roblox Corporation$440K
Linkedin Corporation$230K
Yahoo INC. and Var. Subs/affiliates$180K
Paralyzed Veterans of America$162K
Competitive Carriers Association$150K
Ncta - the Internet & Television Association$130K
Tnc (Us) Holdings Inc$120K
Network Advertising Initiative$100K
American Academy of Pediatrics$100K
Technet$80K
Computer & Communications Industry Association$80K
Software & Information Industry Association (Siia)$60K
21St Century Privacy Coalition$50K
Alliance Defending Freedom$40K
Nintendo of America INC.$30K
National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners$24K
Electronic Frontier Foundation$10K
Status
Introduced November 25, 2025 · Currently: Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 10. · Status as of May 11, 2026
+NO FAKES Act of 2025 H.R. 2794
Active
Bill impact
What it does: A 2025 bill establishing the first federal right against unauthorized AI-generated 'digital replicas' of a person's voice or likeness, imposing civil liability and statutory damages ($5,000–$750,000) on violators, with safe harbors for platforms that remove infringing content and exemptions for news, documentary, and parody uses.
Who it would help / hurt:Data not available at this time.
Sources
govinfo.gov, official bill text (BILLS-119hr2794ih) (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr2794ih/html/BILLS-119hr2794ih.htm)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A.$37.3M
Google Client Services Llc$9.5M
Verizon Communications Inc and Various Subsidiaries$6.3M
International Business Machines Corporation (Ibm)$2.3M
Disney Worldwide Services Inc$2.1M
Universal Music Group$1.2M
Sony Music Entertainment (Formerly Known As Sony Bmg Music Entertainment)$790K
Spotify Usa INC.$780K
Tnc (Us) Holdings Inc$400K
Recording Academy$382K
Broadcast Music, INC.$210K
International Trademark Association$200K
Digital Media Assn$192K
Recording Industry Association of America$150K
Council for Innovation Promotion (C4ip)$140K
Conservatives for Property Rights$138K
American Bar Association$104K
Sag-aftra$100K
Recording Industry Association of America Inc$80K
Getty Images INC.$80K
Directors Guild of America, INC.$80K
Bria Artificial Intelligence INC.$80K
Adobe, INC.$50K
Google Client Services$45K
Verizon Communications Inc and Its Subsidiaries$40K
Computer & Communications Industry Association$40K
American Association of Independent Music$40K
Academy of Television Art & Sciences$20K
Opera America$10K
American Symphony Orchestra League - dba League of American Orchestras$10K
Networkamount undisclosed
Department for Professional Employees Afl-cioamount undisclosed
Status
Introduced April 9, 2025 · Currently: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. · Status as of May 11, 2026
+GEO Act H.R. 301
Active
Bill impact
What it does: A bill amending the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 to require federal agencies to approve or deny geothermal drilling permit applications within 60 days of completing environmental review, while preserving courts' existing authority to halt projects via injunction.
Who it would help / hurt:Data not available at this time.
Sources
govinfo.gov, official bill text (BILLS-119hr301ih) (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr301ih/html/BILLS-119hr301ih.htm)
Who lobbied this bill (top 100 by spend)
Google Client Services Llc$9.5M
Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions, INC.$690K
Corporate Energy Buyers Association (Fka Clean Energy Buyers Association)$490K
Fervo Energy$270K
Fervo Energy Company$220K
Status
Introduced January 9, 2025 · Currently: Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent. · Status as of May 11, 2026
+Kids Online Safety Act S. 1748
Active
Bill impact
What it does: A 2025 bill requiring social media and online platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent harm to minors, including limiting algorithmic recommendations, providing parental controls, and restricting addictive design features -- the current 119th Congress reintroduction of KOSA, distinct from the 118th Congress version that passed the Senate 91-3 as part of S.2073 (see the Technology tab's Kids Online Safety Act card).
Who it would help: Minors and their families using social media and online platforms -- the bill's protective intent.
Who it would hurt: Meta, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, and other social platforms, which would face design-mandate compliance costs; advertising technology companies relying on engagement-maximizing algorithms targeting minors.
American Psychological Association Services Inc.(fka American Psychological Assn$560K
Business Software Alliance$530K
Ebay INC.$480K
Competitive Carriers Association$470K
American Federation of Teachers$450K
Roblox Corporation$404K
Directv, Llc$370K
Yahoo INC. and Var. Subs/affiliates$360K
X Corp. (Formerly Twitter, INC.)$360K
Pinterest, INC.$360K
Travel Tech: the Travel Technology Association$309K
Xcel Energy Inc$220K
Apple INC.$210K
Corporate Energy Buyers Association (Fka Clean Energy Buyers Association)$200K
Computer & Communications Industry Association$160K
Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee$150K
Tnc (Us) Holdings Inc$120K
News/media Alliance$120K
Eating Disorders Coalition$120K
Shopify INC.$100K
American Academy of Pediatrics$100K
Meta Platforms, INC.$90K
Bria Artificial Intelligence INC.$80K
Yahoo Inc, and Var. Subs/affiliates (Fka College Parent, L.p. dba "Yahoo")$60K
Reset Tech Action$60K
Bsa the Software Alliance (Formerly Bsa Business Software Alliance Inc)$60K
Dropbox, INC.$50K
National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners$48K
Google Client Services$45K
Verizon Communications Inc and Its Subsidiaries$40K
Magicschool Ai$40K
Issue One$30K
General Federation of Women's Clubs$20K
Conference of Provincials of North America$20K
National Alliance on Mental Illness$10K
Status
Introduced May 14, 2025 · Currently: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2929-2930) · Status as of May 11, 2026
Money in Politics
Documented political spending by corporations and billionaires, and the taxpayer money that flows back to them — sourced from FEC filings and USASpending.gov.
Taxpayer money to corporations — 2016 to 2025
Year
Federal Contracts
Federal Grants
Medicare Advantage Payments
Corporate Tax Breaks
Medicaid Managed Care
Crop Insurance A&O Subsidies
2016
$140B
$160M
$175.8B
$267.9B
$258.6B
$1.4B
2017
$170B
$73M
$194.0B
$286.4B
$285.7B
$1.5B
2018
$158B
$66M
$218.5B
$277.7B
$288.2B
$1.5B
2019
$110B
$101M
$246.9B
$204.9B
$301.7B
$1.6B
2020
$143B
$86M
$271.2B
$180.6B
$347.8B
$1.7B
2021
$104B
$207M
$315.0B
$177.0B
$406.9B
$1.9B
2022
$113B
$285M
$362.4B
$162.4B
$449.0B
$2.2B
2023
$97B
$385M
$417.2B
$160.4B
$495.0B
$2.4B
2024
$115B
$889M
$458.1B
$187.6B
$496.1B
—
2025
$64B*
$1.7B*
$493.4B*
$263.8B
—
—
* FY2025 not yet closed (ends Sep 30, 2025); figures will increase. Table reflects 2016–2025.
This table reflects recurring annual programs only. Other taxpayer-funded benefits to corporations (e.g., one-time bailouts, loan guarantees, USDA commodity/conservation subsidies not cleanly attributable to corporations) are not included.